POL Scientific / JBM / Volume 11 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.14440/jbm.2024.0047
Cite this article
20
Download
34
Citations
232
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluation of positioning accuracy in head-and-neck cancer treatment: A cone beam computed tomography assessment of three immobilization devices with volumetric modulated arc therapy

Noor Mail1,2* Khalid M. Alshamrani1,3,4 Rab Nawaz Lodhi1,4 Eman Khawandanh1,4 Amani Saleem1,4 Batoor Khan5 Majed Alghamdi1,4 Mohammed Nadershah6 Majid S. Althaqafy1,3,4 Ahmed Subahi1,4,7 Suliman M. Alghamdi1,4
Show Less
1 Ministry of the National Guard - Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
2 Radiation Oncology Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
3 College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
4 King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
5 Department of Life Sciences, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Canada
6 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
7 College of Sciences and Health Professions, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
JBM 2024 , 11(3), e99010025; https://doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2024.0047
Submitted: 29 July 2024 | Revised: 21 August 2024 | Accepted: 27 August 2024 | Published: 12 September 2024
© 2024 by the Journal of Biological Methods published by POL Scientific. Licensee POL Scientific, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

In this study, we assessed the precision and repeatability of the daily patient positioning for three distinct immobilization devices used for head-and-neck patients undergoing RapidArc radiation therapy using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). An analysis was conducted on the accuracy of patient setup for three distinct immobilization devices, resulting in 1204 CBCT images for 189 patients in total. Using a typical posifix supine headrest and five fixation point podcast-plus-thermoplastic masks, the first group of 39 patients (125 CBCTs) was immobilized. The identical method was used to immobilize the second group of 19 patients (158 CBCTs) in the same posture (supine), and AccuFormTM custom headrests were employed as an added measure. Over 65% of the patients in the third group had a double shell positioning system (DSPS) covering their entire head and neck. Patient-alignment-accuracy or couch shifts in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions from CT-CBCT fusions were recorded from ARIA. Our results showed that in 90% of the anteriorposterior (AP), 90% of the superior-inferior (SI), and 92.7% of the right-left (RL) population in the first group, patient-alignment-accuracy or couch shifts were within 2 mm. For 99.4% (AP), 100% (SI), and 98.7% (RL) of the second group’s total population, patient-alignment-accuracy was within 2 mm. In the third group, it was within 2 mm for 92.1% (AP), ~89% (SI), and 93.3% (RL) of the total population. In conclusion, a significant improvement was seen with the application of a mouth bite and a tailored backrest cushion to the five fixation point posicast mask. In addition, significant improvement in the alignment of the lower neck area was observed with the use of DSPS. Virtually 100% of the head-and-neck patients were aligned within an accuracy of 3 mm, which is the PTV margin in our department.

Keywords
Radiotherapy
RapidArc
Immobilization
Head-and-neck tumor
Patient-setup
Mask system
Radiation Oncology
Funding
None.
References
  1. Malicki J. The importance of accurate treatment planning, delivery, and dose verification. Rep Pr Oncol Radiother. 2012;17:63-65. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2012.02.001

 

  1. Hansen CR, Christiansen RL, Nielsen TB, Bertelsen AS, Johansen J, Brink C. Comparison of three immobilisation systems for radiation therapy in head and neck cancer. Acta Oncol. 2014;53:423-427. doi: 10.3109/0284186x.2013.813966

 

  1. Beltran C, Krasin MJ, Merchant TE. Inter- and intrafractional positional uncertainties in pediatric radiotherapy patients with brain and head and neck tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79:1266-1274. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.12.057

 

  1. Boda-Heggemann J, Walter C, Rahn A, et al. Repositioning accuracy of two different mask systems-3D revisited: Comparison using true 3D/3D matching with cone-beam CT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:1568-1575. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.08.054

 

  1. Chen AM, Yu Y, Daly ME, Farwell DG, Benedict SH, Purdy JA. Long‐term experience with reduced planning target volume margins and intensity‐modulated radiotherapy with daily image‐guidance for head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2014;36:1766-1772. doi: 10.1002/hed.23532

 

  1. Graff P, Kirby N, Weinberg V, et al. The residual setup errors of different IGRT alignment procedures for head and neck IMRT and the resulting dosimetric impact. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;86:170-176. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.10.040

 

  1. Castelli J, Simon A, Acosta O, et al. The role of imagingin adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. IRBM. 2014;35:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.irbm.2013.12.003

 

  1. Giske K, Stoiber EM, Schwarz M, et al. Local setup errors in image-guided radiotherapy for head and neck cancer patients immobilized with a custom-made device. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80:582-589. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.1980

 

  1. Chen AM, Farwell DG, Luu Q, Donald PJ, Perks J, Purdy JA. Evaluation of the planning target volume in the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: What is the appropriate expansion margin in the setting of daily image guidance? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:943-949. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.017

 

  1. Kung JS, Tran WT, Poon I, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of rotational corrections for standard-fractionation head and neck image-guided radiotherapy. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019;18:1533033819853824. doi: 10.1177/1533033819853824

 

  1. Anjanappa M, Rafi M, Bhasi S, et al. Setup uncertainties and PTV margins at different anatomical levels in intensity modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2017;22:396-401. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.07.005

 

  1. Georg D, Bogner J, Dieckmann K, Pötter R. Is mask-based stereotactic head-and-neck fixation as precise as stereotactic head fixation for precision radiotherapy? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:S61-S66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.075

 

  1. Gilbeau L, Octave-Prignot M, Loncol T, Renard L, Scalliet P, Grégoire V. Comparison of setup accuracy of three different thermoplastic masks for the treatment of brain and head and neck tumors. Radiother Oncol. 2001;58:155-162. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(00)00280-2

 

  1. Hong TS, Tomé WA, Chappell RJ, Chinnaiyan P, Mehta MP, Harari PM. The impact of daily setup variations on head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;61:779-788. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.696

 

  1. Jones D. ICRU report 50-prescribing, recording and reporting photon beam therapy. Med Phys. 1994;21:833-834. doi: 10.1118/1.597396

 

  1. Landberg T, Chavaudra J, Dobbs J, et al. Report 62. J Int Comm Radiat Units Meas. 1999;os32:NP. doi: 10.1093/jicru/os32.1.report62

 

  1. Van Herk M. Errors and margins in radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004;14:52-64. doi: 10.1053/j.semradonc.2003.10.003

 

  1. Yoram F, Dharsee N, Mkoka DA, Maunda K, Kisukari JD. Radiation therapists’ perceptions of thermoplastic mask use for head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy at Ocean Road Cancer Institute in Tanzania: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2023;18:e0282160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282160

 

  1. Mesías MC, Boda-Heggemann J, Thoelking J, Lohr F, Wenz F, Wertz H. Quantification and assessment of interfraction setup errors based on cone beam CT and determination of safety margins for radiotherapy. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0150326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150326

 

  1. Sharp L, Lewin F, Johansson H, Payne D, Gerhardsson A, Rutqvist LE. Randomized trial on two types of thermoplastic masks for patient immobilization during radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;61:250-256. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.047

 

  1. Bhide S, Nutting C. Recent advances in radiotherapy. BMC Med. 2010;8:25. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-25

 

  1. Leech M, Coffey M, Mast M, et al. ESTRO ACROP guidelines for positioning, immobilisation and position verification of head and neck patients for radiation therapists. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2017;1:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2016.12.001

 

  1. Fu C, Ma C, Shang D, et al. Geometric accuracy evaluation of a six-degree-of-freedom (6-DoF) couch with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) using a phantom and correlation study of the position errors in pelvic tumor radiotherapy. Transl Cancer Res. 2020;9:6005-6012. doi: 10.21037/tcr-20-1528

 

  1. Divneet M, Quoc-Anh H, Betsy W, et al. Comparison of two thermoplastic immobilization mask systems in daily volumetric image guided radiation therapy for head and neck cancers. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2018;4:055007. doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/aad574

 

  1. Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). J ICRU. 2010;10:1-3. doi: 10.1093/jicru_ndq002

 

  1. Islam MK, Purdie TG, Norrlinger BD, et al. Patient dose from kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography imaging in radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2006;33:1573-1582. doi: 10.1118/1.2198169

 

  1. Kim S, Akpati HC, Kielbasa JE, et al. Evaluation of intrafraction patient movement for CNS and head & neck IMRT. Med Phys. 2004;31:500-506. doi: 10.1118/1.1644641

 

  1. Humphreys M, Urbano MTG, Mubata C, et al. Assessment of a customised immobilisation system for head and neck IMRT using electronic portal imaging. Radiother Oncol. 2005;77:39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.06.039

 

  1. I R. Sample Size Calculator by Raosoft Inc; n.d. Available from: https://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html [Last accessed on 2023 Aug 02].

 

  1. Otto K. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. Med Phys. 2008;35:310-317. doi: 10.1118/1.2818738

 

  1. Mail N, Al‐Ghamdi SM, Chantel C, Sedhu F, Rana A, Saoudi A. Customized double‐shell immobilization device combined with VMAT radiation treatment of basosquamous cell carcinoma of the scalp. J Appl Clin Méd Phys. 2019;20:84-93. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12536

 

  1. Li H, Zhu XR, Zhang L, et al. Comparison of 2D radiographic images and 3D cone beam computed tomography for positioning head-and-neck radiotherapy patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:916-925. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.01.008

 

  1. Oita M, Ohmori K, Obinata K, et al. Uncertainty in treatment of head-and-neck tumors by use of intraoral mouthpiece and embedded fiducials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64:1581-1588. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.11.038

 

  1. Rotondo RL, Sultanem K, Lavoie I, Skelly J, Raymond L. Comparison of repositioning accuracy of two commercially available immobilization systems for treatment of head-and-neck tumors using simulation computed tomography imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70:1389-1396. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.035

 

  1. Siebers JV, Keall PJ, Wu Q, Williamson JF, Schmidt- Ullrich RK. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63:422-433. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.02.029

 

  1. Suzuki M, Nishimura Y, Nakamatsu K, et al. Analysis of interfractional set-up errors and intrafractional organ motions during IMRT for head and neck tumors to define an appropriate planning target volume (PTV)- and planning organs at risk volume (PRV)-margins. Radiother Oncol. 2006;78:283-290. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.03.006

 

  1. Wang J, Bai S, Chen N, et al. The clinical feasibility and effect of online cone beam computer tomography-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2009;90:221-227. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.08.017

 

  1. Chen L, Peng YL, Gu SY, et al. Dosimetric effects of head and neck immobilization devices on multi-field intensity modulated radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Cancer. 2018;9:2443-2450. doi: 10.7150/jca.24887

 

  1. Giżyńska MK, Kukołowicz PF, Heijmen BJM. Coping with interfraction time trends in tumor setup. Méd Phys. 2020;47:331-341. doi: 10.1002/mp.13919

 

  1. Kawashita Y, Soutome S, Umeda M, Saito T. Oral management strategies for radiotherapy of head and neck cancer. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2020;56:62-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2020.02.001

 

  1. Cleland S, Crowe SB, Chan P, et al. Development of a customisable 3D-printed intra-oral stent for head-and-neck radiotherapy. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2022;23:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.06.001

 

  1. Devi S, Singh N. Dental care during and after radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2014;5:117-125. doi: 10.4103/0975-5950.154812

 

  1. Tolentino ES, Centurion BS, Ferreira LHC, Souza AP, Damante JH, Rubira-Bullen IRF. Oral adverse effects of head and neck radiotherapy: Literature review and suggestion of a clinical oral care guideline for irradiated patients. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19:448-454. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572011000500003

 

  1. Radiation Oncology Section, Princess Noorah Oncology Center (PNOC). Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: Ministry of the National Guard - Health Affairs. Available from: https://ngha. med.sa/english/medicalcities/jeddah/meddepartments/pnoc [Last accessed on 2024 Jul 15].
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Biological Methods, Electronic ISSN: 2326-9901 Print ISSN: TBA, Published by POL Scientific