POL Scientific / JBM / Volume 11 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.14440/jbm.2024.0047
Submit to JBM
Cite this article
6
Download
16
Citations
82
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluation of positioning accuracy in head and neck cancer treatment: A cone beam computed tomography assessment of three immobilization devices with volumetric modulated arc therapy

Noor Mail1,2* ,  Khalid M. Alshamrani1,3,4 ,  Rab Nawaz Lodhi1,4 ,  Eman Khawandanh1,4 ,  Amani Saleem1,4 ,  Batoor Khan5 ,  Majed Alghamdi1,4 ,  Mohammed Nadershah6 ,  Majid S. Althaqafy1,3,4 ,  Ahmed Subahi1,4,7 ,  Suliman M. Alghamdi1,4
Show Less
1 Ministry of the National Guard - Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
2 Radiation Oncology Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
3 College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
4 King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
5 Department of Life Sciences, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Canada
6 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
7 College of Sciences and Health Professions, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
JBM 2024 , 11(3), e99010025; https://doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2024.0047
Submitted: 29 July 2024 | Accepted: 27 August 2024 | Published: 12 September 2024
© 2024 by the Journal of Biological Methods published by POL Scientific. Licensee POL Scientific, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Download PDF
Cite
XML
HTML
Abstract

In this study, we assessed the precision and repeatability of the daily patient positioning for three distinct immobilization devices used for head and neck patients undergoing RapidArc radiation therapy using the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). An analysis was conducted on the accuracy of patient setup for three distinct immobilization devices, resulting in 1204 CBCT images for 189 patients in total. Using a typical postfix supine headrest and five fixation point podcast-plus-thermoplastic masks, the first group of 39 patients (125 CBCTs) was immobilized. The identical method was used to immobilize the second group of 19 patients (158 CBCTs) in the same posture (supine), and AccuFormTM custom headrests were employed as an added measure. Over 65% of the patients in the third group had Double-shell-Positioning-system (DSPS) covering their entire head and neck. Patient-alignment-accuracy or couch shifts in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions from CT-CBCT fusions were recorded from ARIA. Our results showed that in 90% of the anterior-posterior (AP), 90% of the superior-inferior (SI), and 92.7% of the right-left (RL) population in the first group, patient-alignment-accuracy or couch shifts were within 2 mm. For 99.4% (AP), 100% (SI), and 98.7% (RL) of the second group’s total population, patient-alignment-accuracy was within 2 mm. In the third group, it was within 2 mm for 92.1% (AP), ~89% (SI), and 93.3% (RL) of the total population. In conclusion, a significant improvement was seen with the application of a mouth-bite and a tailored backrest cushion to the five fixation point posicast mask. Additionally, significant improvement in the alignment of lower neck area was observed with the use of DSPS. Virtually 100% of the head and neck patients were aligned within an accuracy of 3 mm, which is the PTV margin in our department.

Keywords
Radiotherapy
RapidArc
Immobilization
Head-and-neck tumor
Patient-setup
Mask system
Radiation Oncology
Funding
None.
References
  1. Malicki J. The importance of accurate treatment planning, delivery, and dose verification. Rep Pr Oncol Radiother 2012;17:63–5. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2012.02.001

 

  1. Hansen CR, Christiansen RL, Nielsen TB, Bertelsen AS, Johansen J, Brink C. Comparison of three immobilisation systems for radiation therapy in head and neck cancer. Acta Oncol 2014;53:423–7. doi: 10.3109/0284186x.2013.813966

 

  1. Beltran C, Krasin MJ, Merchant TE. Inter- and Intrafractional Positional Uncertainties in Pediatric Radiotherapy Patients With Brain and Head and Neck Tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biology Phys 2011;79:1266–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.12.057

 

  1. Boda-Heggemann J, Walter C, Rahn A, Wertz H, Loeb I, Lohr F, et al. Repositioning accuracy of two different mask systems—3D revisited: Comparison using true 3D/3D matching with cone-beam CT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biology Phys 2006;66:1568–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.08.054

 

  1. Chen AM, Yu Y, Daly ME, Farwell DG, Benedict SH, Purdy JA. Long‐term experience with reduced planning target volume margins and intensity‐modulated radiotherapy with daily image‐guidance for head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2014;36:1766–72. doi: 10.1002/hed.23532

 

  1. Graff P, Kirby N, Weinberg V, Chen J, Yom SS, Lambert L, et al. The Residual Setup Errors of Different IGRT Alignment Procedures for Head and Neck IMRT and the Resulting Dosimetric Impact. Int J Radiat Oncol Biology Phys 2013;86:170–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.10.040

 

  1. Castelli J, Simon A, Acosta O, Haigron P, Nassef M, Henry O, et al. The role of imaging in adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Irbm 2014;35:33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.irbm.2013.12.003

 

  1. Giske K, Stoiber EM, Schwarz M, Stoll A, Muenter MW, Timke C, et al. Local Setup Errors in Image-Guided Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Immobilized With a Custom-Made Device. Int J Radiat Oncol Biology Phys 2011;80:582–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.1980

 

  1. Chen AM, Farwell DG, Luu Q, Donald PJ, Perks J, Purdy JA. Evaluation of the Planning Target Volume in the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy: What Is the Appropriate Expansion Margin in the Setting of Daily Image Guidance? Int J Radiat Oncol Biology Phys 2011;81:943–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.017

 

  1. Kung JS, Tran WT, Poon I, Atenafu EG, Courneyea L, Higgins K, et al. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Rotational Corrections for Standard-Fractionation Head and Neck Image-Guided Radiotherapy. Technol Cancer Res T 2019;18:1533033819853824. doi: 10.1177/1533033819853824

 

  1. Anjanappa M, Rafi M, Bhasi S, Kumar R, Thommachan KC, Bhattacharya T, et al. Setup uncertainties and PTV margins at different anatomical levels in intensity modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer. Reports Pract Oncol Radiotherapy 2017;22:396–401. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.07.005

 

  1. Georg D, Bogner J, Dieckmann K, Pötter R. Is mask-based stereotactic head-and-neck fixation as precise as stereotactic head fixation for precision radiotherapy? Int J Radiat Oncol Biology Phys 2006;66:S61–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.075

 

  1. Gilbeau L, Octave-Prignot M, Loncol T, Renard L, Scalliet P, Grégoire V. Comparison of setup accuracy of three different thermoplastic masks for the treatment of brain and head and neck tumors. Radiother Oncol 2001;58:155–62. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(00)00280-2

 

  1. Hong TS, Tomé WA, Chappell RJ, Chinnaiyan P, Mehta MP, Harari PM. The impact of daily setup variations on head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biology Phys 2005;61:779–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.696

 

  1. Jones D. ICRU Report 50—Prescribing, Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy. Med Phys 1994;21:833–4. doi: 10.1118/1.597396

 

  1. Landberg T, Chavaudra J, Dobbs J, Gerard J-P, Hanks G, Horiot J-C, et al. Report 62. J Int Comm Radiat Units Meas 1999;os32:NP-NP. doi: 10.1093/jicru/os32.1.report62

 

  1. Herk M van. Errors and margins in radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2004;14:52–64. doi: 10.1053/j.semradonc.2003.10.003

 

  1. Yoram F, Dharsee N, Mkoka DA, Maunda K, Kisukari JD. Radiation therapists’ perceptions of thermoplastic mask use for head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy at Ocean Road Cancer Institute in Tanzania: A qualitative study. PLOS ONE 2023;18:e0282160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282160

 

  1. Mesías MC, Boda-Heggemann J, Thoelking J, Lohr F, Wenz F, Wertz H. Quantification and Assessment of Interfraction Setup Errors Based on Cone Beam CT and Determination of Safety Margins for Radiotherapy. Plos One 2016;11:e0150326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150326

 

  1. Sharp L, Lewin F, Johansson H, Payne D, Gerhardsson A, Rutqvist LE. Randomized trial on two types of thermoplastic masks for patient immobilization during radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biology Phys 2005;61:250–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.047

 

  1. Bhide S, Nutting C. Recent advances in radiotherapy. BMC Med 2010;8:25. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-25

 

  1. Leech M, Coffey M, Mast M, Moura F, Osztavics A, Pasini D, et al. ESTRO ACROP guidelines for positioning, immobilisation and position verification of head and neck patients for radiation therapists. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2017;1:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2016.12.001

 

  1. Fu C, Ma C, Shang D, Qiu Q, Meng H, Duan J, et al. Geometric accuracy evaluation of a six-degree-of-freedom (6-DoF) couch with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) using a phantom and correlation study of the position errors in pelvic tumor radiotherapy. Transl Cancer Res 2020;9:6005–12. doi: 10.21037/tcr-20-1528

 

  1. Divneet M, Quoc-Anh H, Betsy W, Gia J, Denise R, Christopher W, et al. Comparison of two thermoplastic immobilization mask systems in daily volumetric image guided radiation therapy for head and neck cancers. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2018;4:055007. doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/aad574

 

  1. Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Photon-Beam Intensity- Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT). J Icru 2010;10:1–3. doi: 10.1093/jicru_ndq002

 

  1. Islam MK, Purdie TG, Norrlinger BD, Alasti H, Moseley DJ, Sharpe MB, et al. Patient dose from kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography imaging in radiation therapy. Med Phys 2006;33:1573–82. doi: 10.1118/1.2198169

 

  1. Kim S, Akpati HC, Kielbasa JE, Li JG, Liu C, Amdur RJ, et al. Evaluation of intrafraction patient movement for CNS and head & neck IMRT. Med Phys 2004;31:500–6. doi: 10.1118/1.1644641

 

  1. Humphreys M, Urbano MTG, Mubata C, Miles E, Harrington KJ, Bidmead M, et al. Assessment of a customised immobilisation system for head and neck IMRT using electronic portal imaging. Radiother Oncol 2005;77:39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.06.039

 

  1. I R. Sample Size Calculator by Raosoft Inc n.d. http://www. raosoft.com/samplesize.html (accessed August 2, 2023).

 

  1. Otto K. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. Med Phys 2008;35:310–7. doi: 10.1118/1.2818738

 

  1. Mail N, Al‐Ghamdi SM, Chantel C, Sedhu F, Rana A, Saoudi A. Customized double‐shell immobilization device combined with VMAT radiation treatment of basosquamous cell carcinoma of the scalp. J Appl Clin Méd Phys 2019;20:84–93. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12536

 

  1. Li H, Zhu XR, Zhang L, Dong L, Tung S, Ahamad A, et al. Comparison of 2D Radiographic Images and 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Positioning Head-and-Neck Radiotherapy Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biology Phys 2008;71:916–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.01.008

 

  1. Oita M, Ohmori K, Obinata K, Kinoshita R, Onimaru R, Tsuchiya K, et al. Uncertainty in treatment of head-and-neck tumors by use of intraoral mouthpiece and embedded fiducials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biology Phys 2006;64:1581–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.11.038

 

  1. Rotondo RL, Sultanem K, Lavoie I, Skelly J, Raymond L. Comparison of Repositioning Accuracy of Two Commercially Available Immobilization Systems for Treatment of Head-and-Neck Tumors Using Simulation Computed Tomography Imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biology Phys 2008;70:1389–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.035

 

  1. Siebers JV, Keall PJ, Wu Q, Williamson JF, Schmidt-Ullrich RK. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans. Int J Radiat Oncol Biology Phys 2005;63:422–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.02.029

 

  1. Suzuki M, Nishimura Y, Nakamatsu K, Okumura M, Hashiba H, Koike R, et al. Analysis of interfractional set-up errors and intrafractional organ motions during IMRT for head and neck tumors to define an appropriate planning target volume (PTV)- and planning organs at risk volume (PRV)-margins. Radiother Oncol 2006;78:283–90. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.03.006

 

  1. Wang J, Bai S, Chen N, Xu F, Jiang X, Li Y, et al. The clinical feasibility and effect of online cone beam computer tomography-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2009;90:221–7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.08.017

 

  1. Chen L, Peng Y-L, Gu S-Y, Shen H, Zhang D-D, Sun W-Z, et al. Dosimetric Effects of Head and Neck Immobilization Devices on Multi-field Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. J Cancer 2018;9:2443–50. doi: 10.7150/jca.24887

 

  1. Giżyńska MK, Kukołowicz PF, Heijmen BJM. Coping with interfraction time trends in tumor setup. Méd Phys 2020;47:331–41. doi: 10.1002/mp.13919

 

  1. Kawashita Y, Soutome S, Umeda M, Saito T. Oral management strategies for radiotherapy of head and neck cancer. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2020;56:62–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2020.02.001

 

  1. Cleland S, Crowe SB, Chan P, Chua B, Dawes J, Kenny L, et al. Development of a customisable 3D-printed intra-oral stent for head-and-neck radiotherapy. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2022;23:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.06.001

 

  1. Devi S, Singh N. Dental care during and after radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2014;5:117–25. doi: 10.4103/0975-5950.154812

 

  1. Tolentino E de S, Centurion BS, Ferreira LHC, Souza AP de, Damante JH, Rubira-Bullen IRF. Oral adverse effects of head and neck radiotherapy: literature review and suggestion of a clinical oral care guideline for irradiated patients. J Appl Oral Sci 2011;19:448–54. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572011000500003
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Biological Methods, Electronic ISSN: 2326-9901 Print ISSN: TBA, Published by POL Scientific
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept