POL Scientific / Bladder / Volume 11 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.14440/bladder.2024.0026
Cite this article
3
Download
5
Citations
28
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Safety and efficacy of the MP1000 surgical system in robot-assisted radical cystectomy: A prospective study

Qing Ai1† Xupeng Zhao1,2† Bin Jiang1,2† Qiang Cheng1 Yin Lu1,2 Jinlu Tang1,3 Yi Feng1,3 Lu Tang1 Xu Zhang1* Hongzhao Li1*
Show Less
1 Department of Urology, The Third Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
2 School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
3 Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China
Bladder 2024 , 11(3), e21200013; https://doi.org/10.14440/bladder.2024.0026
Submitted: 3 August 2024 | Revised: 31 August 2024 | Accepted: 30 September 2024 | Published: 6 November 2024
© 2024 by the Bladder published by POL Scientific. Licensee POL Scientific, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Background: Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has become widely adopted due to its numerous advantages, with the da Vinci robotic surgical system being the most commonly used across the globe. However, the high cost limits its broader application. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of performing RARC using the more economical MP1000 surgical system. Methods: In this prospective, single-center, single-blind study, 21 patients scheduled for RARC between April and June 2024 were randomly assigned to undergo surgery with either the da Vinci Si system or the MP1000 system. The primary outcome was the rate of conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery. Secondary outcomes included robotic arm installation time, total surgery duration, intraoperative complications, intraoperative blood loss, post-operative positive margin rate, length of post-operative hospital stay, and short-term post-operative complications. Results: All surgeries were successfully completed without conversion to open or laparoscopic procedures, and no intraoperative complications related to robotic mechanical failure were observed. The robotic arm installation time was slightly longer with the MP1000 system compared to the da Vinci Si system (20.75 vs. 17.13 min, P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in surgery duration, intraoperative blood loss, post-operative positive margin rate, post-operative hospital stay, or short-term post-operative complications. In addition, there was no significant difference in National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index scores, a measure of the operator workload. The primary limitation of this study was its small sample size. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that the MP1000 surgical system was a safe, feasible, and effective alternative for RARC, and achieved comparable outcomes to the da Vinci Si system.

Keywords
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy
Bladder cancer
MP1000 robot
Da Vinci robot
Robotic surgery
Funding
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2023YFC2507006).
References
  1. Netto GJ, Amin MB, Berney DM, et al. The 2022 world health organization classification of tumors of the urinary system and male genital organs-part B: Prostate and urinary tract tumors. Eur Urol. 2022;82(5):469-82. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.07.002

 

  1. Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, et al. Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int. 2003;92(3):232-236 doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04329.x

 

  1. Fan LW, Li YR, Wu CM, et al. Inpatient outcomes of patients undergoing robot-assisted versus laparoscopic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A National inpatient sample database study. J Clin Med. 2024;13(3):772. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030772

 

  1. Dixon S, Hill H, Flight L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted radical cystectomy vs open radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(6):e2317255. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17255

 

  1. Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Marzouk KH, et al. Randomized trial comparing open radical cystectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: Oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol. 2018;74(4):465-471. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.04.030

 

  1. Hussein AA, Elsayed AS, Aldhaam NA, et al. Ten-year oncologic outcomes following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Results from the international robotic cystectomy consortium. J Urol. 2019;202(5):927-935. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000386

 

  1. Gill IS, Cacciamani GE. The changing face of urologic oncologic surgery from 2000-2018 (63 141 patients)-impact of robotics. Eur Urol Suppl. 2019;18(1):e656-e657. doi: 10.1016/s1569-9056(19)30485-3

 

  1. Group TCRARCC. Chinese expert consensus on roboticassisted radical cystectomy. Chin J Urol. 2018;2018(39(1):2-5.

 

  1. Steffens D, McBride KE, Hirst N, et al. Surgical outcomes and cost analysis of a multi-specialty robotic-assisted surgery caseload in the Australian public health system. J Robot Surg. 2023;17(5):2237-2245. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01643-6

 

  1. Hussein AA, Mohsin R, Qureshi H, et al. Transition from da Vinci to Versius robotic surgical system: Initial experience and outcomes of over 100 consecutive procedures. J Robot Surg. 2023;17(2):419-426. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01422-9

 

  1. Lin YC, Yuan LH, Tseng CS, et al. Comparison of senhance and da vinci robotic radical prostatectomy: Short-term outcomes, learning curve, and cost analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024;27(1):116-121. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00717-8

 

  1. Niu S, Ao L, Gao Y, et al. Suitability of the MP1000 Platform for robot-assisted prostatectomy: A prospective randomised controlled trial. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024;64:2-8. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.02.017

 

  1. Gao Y, Yang Y, Niu S, et al. Suitability of the MP1000 system for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: A multicenter randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Int J Surg. 2024;110(5):2803-2809. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001166

 

  1. Bansal A, Sankhwar S, Goel A, Kumar M, Purkait B, Aeron R. Grading of complications of transurethral resection of bladder tumor using Clavien-Dindo classification system. Indian J Urol. 2016;32(3):232-237. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.185104

 

  1. Dias RD, Ngo-Howard MC, Boskovski MT, Zenati MA, Yule SJ. Systematic review of measurement tools to assess surgeons’ intraoperative cognitive workload. Br J Surg. 2018;105(5):491-501. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10795

 

  1. Zhang KY, Hu JS, Liu XH. Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted total cystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg. 2024;47(4):2028-2032. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.01.035

 

  1. Li P, Meng C, Peng L, et al. Perioperative comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical cystectomy: An update meta-analysis. Asian J Surg. 2023;46(9):3464-79. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.04.030

 

  1. Kurpad R, Woods M. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112(7):728-735. doi: 10.1002/jso.24009

 

  1. Faraj KS, Abdul-Muhsin HM, Rose KM, et al. Robot assisted radical cystectomy vs open radical cystectomy: Over 10 years of the mayo clinic experience. Urol Oncol. 2019;37(12):862-869. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.07.019

 

  1. Catto JWF, Khetrapal P, Ricciardi F, et al. Effect of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion vs open radical cystectomy on 90-day morbidity and mortality among patients with bladder cancer: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;327(21):2092-20103. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.7393

 

  1. Wang Y, Ai Q, Zhao W, et al. Safety and reliability of a robot-assisted laparoscopic telesurgery system: Expanding indications in urological surgery. Eur Urol. 2024;85(5):506-507. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.11.002
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Share
Back to top
Bladder, Electronic ISSN: 2327-2120 Print ISSN: TBA, Published by POL Scientific