POL Scientific / JBM / Volume 9 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.14440/jbm.2022.386
Cite this article
35
Citations
113
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

An experimental method for evoking and characterizing dynamic color patterning of cuttlefish during prey capture

Danbee Kim1,2 Kendra C. Buresch3 Roger T. Hanlon3 Adam R. Kampff1,2
Show Less
1 International Neuroscience Doctoral Programme, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon 1400-038, Portugal
2 Intelligent Systems Lab, Sainsbury Wellcome Centre for Neural Circuits and Behavior, London W1T 4 JG, UK
3 Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA
JBM 2022 , 9(2), 1;
Published: 14 June 2022
© 2022 by the author. Licensee POL Scientific, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Cuttlefish are active carnivores that possess a wide repertoire of body patterns that can be changed within milliseconds for many types of camouflage and communication. The forms and functions of many body patterns are well known from ethological studies in the field and laboratory. Yet one aspect has not been reported in detail: the category of rapid, brief and high-contrast changes in body coloration (“Tentacle Shot Patterns” or TSPs) that always occur with the ejection of two ballistic tentacles to strike live moving prey (“Tentacles Go Ballistic” or TGB moment). We designed and tested a mechanical device that presented prey in a controlled manner, taking advantage of a key stimulus for feeding: motion of the prey. High-speed video recordings show a rapid transition into TSPs starting 114 ms before TGB (N = 114). TSPs are then suppressed as early as 470–500 ms after TGB (P < 0.05) in unsuccessful hunts, while persisting for at least 3 s after TGB in successful hunts. A granularity analysis revealed significant differences in the large-scale high-contrast body patterning present in TSPs compared to the camouflage body pattern deployed beforehand. TSPs best fit the category of secondary defense called deimatic displaying, meant to briefly startle predators and interrupt their attack sequence while cuttlefish are distracted by striking prey. We characterize TSPs as a pattern category for which the main distinguishing feature is a high-contrast signaling pattern with aspects of Acute Conflict Mottle or Acute Disruptive Pattern. The data and methodology presented here open opportunities for quantifying the rapid neural responses in this visual sensorimotor set of behaviors.

Keywords
deimatic behavior
secondary defense
cephalopod
body patterning
Sepia officinalis
References

1. Adamo SA, Ehgoetz K, Sangster C, Whitehorne I. Signaling to the enemy? Body pattern expression and its response to external cues during hunting in the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis (Cephalopoda). Biol Bull. 2006 Jun;210(3):192–200. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134557 PMID:16801494
2. Holmes W. The colour changes and colour patterns of Sepia officinalis L. Proc Zool Soc Lond. 1940;110(1-2):17–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1940.tb08457.x.
3. How MJ, Norman MD, Finn J, Chung WS, Marshall NJ. Dynamic skin patterns in cephalopods. Front Physiol. 2017 Jun;8(8):393. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00393 PMID:28674500
4. Langridge KV. Symmetrical crypsis and asymmetrical signalling in the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis. Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Apr;273(1589):959–67. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3395 PMID:16627281
5. Langridge KV, Broom M, Osorio D. Selective signalling by cuttlefish to predators. Curr Biol. 2007 Dec;17(24):R1044–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.028 PMID:18088584
6. Shashar N, Rutledge P, Cronin T. Polarization vision in cuttlefish in a concealed communication channel? J Exp Biol. 1996;199(Pt 9):2077–84. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.199.9.2077 PMID:9319987
7. Hanlon RT, Messenger JB. Cephalopod Behaviour. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1017/9780511843600.
8. Hill AV, Solandt DY. Myograms from the chromatophores of Sepia. J Physiol. 1935;83:13–4.
9. Hanlon R. Cephalopod dynamic camouflage. Curr Biol. 2007 Jun;17(11):R400–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.03.034 PMID:17550761
10. Hadjisolomou SP, El-Haddad RW, Kloskowski K, Chavarga A, Abramov I. Quantifying the speed of chromatophore activity at the single-organ level in response to a visual startle stimulus in living, intact squid. Front Physiol. 2021 Jun;12:675252. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.675252 PMID:34220538
11. Messenger JB. The visual attack of the cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis. Anim Behav. 1968 Apr-Jul;16(2):342–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(68)90020-1 PMID:5691850
12. Sereni E. The chromatophores of the cephalopods. Biol Bull. 1930;59(3):247–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/1536813.
13. Thompson DW (1910) Aristotle: Historia animalium. The works of Aristotle translated into English, book IV. The Classical Review.
14. Cole PD, Adamo SA. Cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis: Cephalopoda) hunting behavior and associative learning. Anim Cogn. 2005 Jan;8(1):27–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-004-0228-9 PMID:15592760
15. Duval P, Chichery MP, Chichery R. Prey capture by the cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis L): an experimental study of two strategies. Behav Processes. 1984 Jan;9(1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(84)90004-4 PMID:24923825
16. Feord RC, Sumner ME, Pusdekar S, Kalra L, Gonzalez-Bellido PT, Wardill TJ. Cuttlefish use stereopsis to strike at prey. Sci Adv. 2020 Jan;6(2):eaay6036. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay6036 PMID:31934631
17. Zylinski S, Osorio D, Shohet AJ. (2009) Cuttlefish camouflage: context-dependent body pattern use during motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276(1675):3963-9. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1083.
18. Hanlon RT, Messenger JB. Adaptive coloration in young cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis L.): the morphology and development of body patterns and their relation to behaviour. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1988;320(1200):437–87. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1988.0087.
19. Carreno Castilla A, Hernandez-Urcera J, Gouraguine A, Guerra Á, Cabanellas-Reboredo M. Predation behaviour of the European squid Loligo vulgaris. J Ethol. 2020;38(3):311–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-020-00652-4.
20. Panetta D, Solomon M, Buresch K, Hanlon RT. Small-scale rearing of cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) for research purposes. Mar Freshwat Behav Physiol. 2017;50(2):115–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10236244.2017.1343631.
21. Lopes G, Bonacchi N, Frazão J, Neto JP, Atallah BV, Soares S, et al. Bonsai: an event-based framework for processing and controlling data streams. Front Neuroinform. 2015 Apr;9:7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2015.00007 PMID:25904861
22. Barbosa A, Mäthger LM, Buresch KC, Kelly J, Chubb C, Chiao CC, et al. Cuttlefish camouflage: the effects of substrate contrast and size in evoking uniform, mottle or disruptive body patterns. Vision Res. 2008 May;48(10):1242–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.011 PMID:18395241
23. Packard A, Hochberg FG. Skin patterning in Octopus and other genera. Symp Zool Soc Lond. 1977;38:191–231.
24. Kier W, Leeuwen J. A kinematic analysis of tentacle extension in the squid Loligo pealei. J Exp Biol. 1997;200(Pt 1):41–53. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.200.1.41 PMID:9317299
25. Graving JM, Chae D, Naik H, Li L, Koger B, Costelloe BR, et al. DeepPoseKit, a software toolkit for fast and robust animal pose estimation using deep learning. eLife. 2019 Oct;8:e47994. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47994 PMID:31570119
26. Mathis A, Mamidanna P, Cury KM, Abe T, Murthy VN, Mathis MW, et al. DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning. Nat Neurosci. 2018 Sep;21(9):1281–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0209-y PMID:30127430
27. Nath T, Mathis A, Chen AC, Patel A, Bethge M, Mathis MW. Using DeepLabCut for 3D markerless pose estimation across species and behaviors. Nat Protoc. 2019 Jul;14(7):2152–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-019-0176-0 PMID:31227823
28. Messenger JB. Cephalopod chromatophores: neurobiology and natural history. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001 Nov;76(4):473–528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793101005772 PMID:11762491
29. Lopes G, Monteiro P. New open-source tools: using Bonsai for behavioral tracking and closed-loop experiments. Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Mar;15:53. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.647640 PMID:33867952
30. Laan A, Gutnick T, Kuba MJ, Laurent G. Behavioral analysis of cuttlefish traveling waves and its implications for neural control. Curr Biol. 2014 Aug;24(15):1737–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.027 PMID:25042589
31. Reiter S, Hülsdunk P, Woo T, Lauterbach MA, Eberle JS, Akay LA, et al. Elucidating the control and development of skin patterning in cuttlefish. Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7727):361–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0591-3 PMID:30333578
32. Chiao CC, Chubb C, Hanlon RT. A review of visual perception mechanisms that regulate rapid adaptive camouflage in cuttlefish. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2015 Sep;201(9):933–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-015-0988-5 PMID:25701389

Share
Back to top
Journal of Biological Methods, Electronic ISSN: 2326-9901 Print ISSN: TAB, Published by POL Scientific