POL Scientific / JBM / Volume 1 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.14440/jbm.2014.27
Cite this article
1
Download
25
Citations
60
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

Proof of concept for a novel functional screening system for plant sucrose effluxers

Yuchan Zhou1 Christopher P. L. Grof1 John W. Patrick1
Show Less
1 School of Environmental & Life Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
JBM 2014 , 1(2), 1;
Published: 18 July 2014
© 2014 by the author. Licensee POL Scientific, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Membrane transporters play pivotal roles in facilitating sucrose transport in plants and their activities have been shown to impact plant growth rates and crop yield.  In contrast to the well-defined mechanism of sucrose influx across plasma membranes, less is known about sucrose efflux mechanisms and the membrane proteins supporting this function.  A major impediment blocking progress in this key area of plant science is the absence of a functional screening system for genes encoding sucrose effluxers.  Here we report a novel yeast system for screening sucrose effluxers based on sucrose release from yeast cells genetically modified to synthesize, but not to metabolize, sucrose.  Inhibiting sucrose metabolism was achieved using yeast strains, SEY 6210 and YSL4-6, carrying mutations in genes encoding invertase and maltase, respectively.  Genes encoding essential components of sucrose biosynthesis, sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) and sucrose phosphate phosphatase (SPP), were used to transform the two yeast hosts to make strains SuPy (from SEY6210) and Ysu (from YSL4-6).  Cultures of SuPy15 cells were found to be capable of synthesizing sucrose when supplied with various compounds as the sole carbon source, including non-fermentable sugars and non-sugar substrates.  A proof of concept of the screening system was demonstrated by transforming SuPy15 with sucrose transporter genes known to encode plasma membrane proteins that mediate sucrose efflux.  The robustness of the yeast SuPy15 system as a novel platform to screen putative plant sucrose effluxers is discussed.

Keywords
Functional screen
Sucrose effluxer
Sucrose transporter
Yeast mutant
cDNA library
References

1. Kühn C, Grof C (2010) Sucrose transporters of higher plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13: 288-298.
2. Martinoia E, Meyer S, De Angeli A, Nagy R (2012) Vacuolar transporters in their physiological context. Annu Rev Plant Biol 63: 183-213.
3. Chen L-Q (2013) SWEET sugar transporters for phloem transport and pathogen nutrition. New Phytologist: DOI: 10.1111/nph.12445.
4. Riesmeier J, Willmitzer L, Frommer W (1992) Isolation and characterization of a sucrose carrier cDNA from spinach by functional expression in yeast. EMBO J 11: 4705-4713.
5. Zhou Y, Qu H, Dibley KE, Offler CE, Patrick JW (2007) A suite of sucrose transporters expressed in coats of developing legume seeds includes novel pH-independent facilitators. Plant J 49: 750–764.
6. Schulz A, Beyhl D, Marten I, Wormit A, Neuhaus E, et al. (2011) Proton-driven sucrose symport and antiport are provided by the vacuolar transporters SUC4 and TMT1/2. Plant J 68: 129-136.
7. Doidy J, Grace E, Kühn C, Simon-Plas F, Casieri L, et al. (2012) Sugar transporters in plants and in their interactions with fungi. Trends Plant Sci 17: 413-422.
8. Ton V-K, Rao R (2004) Functional expression of heterologous proteins in yeast: insights into Ca2 signaling and Ca2 -transporting ATPases. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 287: C580–C589.
9. Gietz RD, Sugino A (1988) New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene 74: 527-534.
10. Wieczorke R, Krampe S, Weierstall T, Freidel K, Hollenberg C, et al. (1999) Concurrent knock-out of at least 20 transporter genes is required to block uptake of hexoses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 464: 123–128.
11. Gietz RD, Woods RA (2002) Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. Methods in Enzymology 350: 87-96.
12. Birnberg PR, Brenner ML (1984) A one-step enzymatic assay for sucrose with sucrose phosphorylase. Anal Biochem 142: 556-561.
13. Neigeborn L, Carlson M (1984) Genes affecting the regulation of SUC2 gene expression by glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 108: 845-858.
14. Khan N, Zimmermann F, Eaton N (1973) Genetic and biochemical evidence of sucrose fermentation by maltase in yeast. J Mol Gen Genet 123: 43-50.
15. Robinson J, Klionsky D, Banta L, Emr S (1988) Protein sorting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: isolation of mutants defective in the delivery and processing of multiple vacuolar hydrolases. Mol Cell Biol 8: 4936–4048.
16. Diderich J, Schuurmans J, Van Gaalen M, Kruckeberg A, Van Dam K (2001) Functional analysis of the hexose transporter homologue HXT5 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 18: 1515-1524.
17. Holmes EW (1997) Coupled enzymatic assay for the determination of sucrose. Anal Biochem 244: 103–109.
18. FDA (2013) Guidance for Industry bioanalytical method validation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm.
19. Huber R, Palmen T, Ryk N, Hillmer A, Luft K, et al. (2010) Replication methods and tools in high-throughput cultivation processes - recognizing potential variations of growth and product formation by on-line monitoring. BMC Biotechnol 10: 22.
20. Rohe P, Venkanna D, Kleine B, Freudl R, Oldiges M (2012) An automated workflow for enhancing microbial bioprocess optimization on a novel microbioreactor platform. Microb Cell Fact 11: 144.
21. Clark T (2009) Thin-layer chromatography: Detection: Radioactivity detection. In: Wilson ID, Adlard ER, Cooke M, Poole CF, editors. Handbook of methods and instrumentation in separation science: Academic Press.
22. Miller WG, Brandl MT, Quiñones B, Lindow SE (2001) Biological sensor for sucrose availability: relative sensitivities of various reporter genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 1308-1317.
23. Reid SJ, Abratt VR (2005) Sucrose utilisation in bacteria: genetic organisation and regulation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 67: 312-321
24. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spriing Harbor, New York: Cold Spriing Harbor Laboratory Press.
25. Ingram L (1990) Ethanol tolerance in bacteria. Crit Rev Biotech 9: 305.
26. Wang J, Gilles E, Lengeler J, Jahreis K (2001) Modeling of inducer exclusion and catabolite repression based on a PTS-dependent sucrose and non-PTS-dependent glycerol transport systems in Escherichia coli K-12 and its experimental verification. J Biotech 92: 133-158.
27. Lager I, Looger L, Hilpert M, Lalonde S, Frommer W (2006) Conversion of a putative Agrobacterium sugar-binding protein into a FRET sensor with high selectivity for sucrose. J Biol Chem 281: 30875-30883.
28. Chen L-Q, Qu X-Q, Hou B-H, Sosso D, Osorio S, et al. (2012) Sucrose Efflux Mediated by SWEET Proteins as a Key Step for Phloem Transport. Science 335: 207-211

Share
Back to top
Journal of Biological Methods, Electronic ISSN: 2326-9901 Print ISSN: TAB, Published by POL Scientific