AccScience Publishing / Bladder / Online First / DOI: 10.14440/bladder.0464
REVIEW

Current evidence on the role of urinary microbiome in bladder cancer: A narrative review

Nikhila Sampath Kumar1 ,  Anushareddy Muddasani2 ,  Rohan Seth3 ,  Bhavesh Mohan Lal1
Show Less
1 Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States of America
2 Division of Hematology and Oncology, Faculty of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States of America
3 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States of America
Submitted: 31 December 2025 | Revised: 15 March 2026 | Accepted: 25 March 2026 | Published: 29 September 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

For decades, urine was thought to be sterile, and any bacteria found in it were thought to be due to an infection. However, new sequencing technologies have changed this view and shown that even healthy people have a unique urinary microbiome. To understand how this urinary microbiome may relate to bladder cancer, we reviewed human studies that characterized urinary microbial profiles in patients with bladder cancer using culture-independent and enhanced culture-based methods. Across the literature, bladder cancer is consistently associated with shifts in microbial community structure, including loss of bacteria thought to support mucosal health and enrichment of organisms linked to inflammation and epithelial injury. Several studies further suggest that specific urinary microbial patterns correlate with tumor presence, risk of recurrence, and even response to intravesical and systemic immunotherapy, raising the possibility that the microbiome influences disease behavior rather than merely reflecting it. Proposed mechanisms include altered immune signaling within the bladder, production of pro-carcinogenic metabolites, and disruption of the urothelial barrier that may promote chronic inflammation. Taken together, the available data suggest that bladder cancer does not develop in isolation but within a dynamic microbial environment that may shape tumor biology and treatment responses. Larger, prospective studies using standardized bladder-specific sampling are needed to determine whether urinary microbiome alterations are drivers of carcinogenesis or consequences of tumor-induced changes and to evaluate their potential as non-invasive biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Keywords
Urinary microbiome
Microbiome
Bladder cancer
Bacillus Calmette–Guérin
Urinary tract infection

1. Introduction

The human body harbors complex microbial communities at multiple anatomical sites; these site-specific communities are collectively referred to as “microbiomes.” 1 These microbial communities contribute to local ecological balance and host homeostasis. In 1683, Anthonie van Leeuwenhoek first described small “animalcules” in dental plaque, providing one of the earliest observations of microorganisms in the human body 2. Since then, major microbiomes have been identified in the skin, oral cavity, gut, and respiratory tract, with more recent studies demonstrating the presence of a resident microbiome in the urinary tract. For many years, urine and the bladder were considered sterile, with the presence of microbes in urine being attributed to contamination from the external genital tract or sampling errors. This view was disputed by early sequencing studies using 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene surveys beginning around 2010, which hinted at bacterial DNA in voided urine from healthy people, even though these works were not initially recognized as definitive evidence of a resident urinary microbiome 3-5. Standard urine culture techniques developed in the mid-20th century only grow fast-growing uropathogens but fail to detect common fastidious organisms that are present in lower numbers in an uninfected “disease-free” bladder 6.

The mere presence of some species within specific microbiomes greatly increases the risk of certain cancers, such as head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the presence of viruses like Epstein–Barr virus and human papillomavirus, and gastric cancer in Helicobacter pylori colonizers 7-9. Bladder cancer is the ninth most common cancer in the world and amongst the top 10 most common cancers in the United States, with 18 cases projected to be diagnosed per 100,000 people per year 10, 11. There is a noticeable disparity in incidence and treatment outcomes between men and women, with men being diagnosed nearly three times more commonly and women experiencing poorer outcomes after diagnosis 12,13. Risk factors for bladder cancer include, but are not limited to, age (preponderance in older adults), sex (more common in males), smoking history, family history, exposure to aniline dyes, chemotherapy, radiation, presence of indwelling catheters, and schistosomiasis 14-17. Given the heterogeneity of the affected population, diverse risk factors, and low likelihood of cancer in asymptomatic individuals, screening is not recommended 18.

This review aims to consolidate current literature on the role of the urinary microbiome in bladder carcinogenesis and in disease behavior among patients with established bladder cancer. We also highlight current knowledge gaps and unresolved questions in the literature.

2. Methods

A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify studies evaluating the role of the urinary microbiome in bladder cancer. Electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched from inception through December 2025 using combinations of the terms “urinary microbiome,” “urine microbiome,” “bladder microbiota,” “bladder cancer,” “urothelial carcinoma,” and “16S rRNA sequencing.” Only peer-reviewed human studies published in English were included in this narrative review. Eligible studies comprised observational cohorts, case–control studies, and clinical trials that characterized urinary microbial composition using microbiome-characterization methods such as 16S rRNA gene sequencing, metagenomic sequencing, and expanded quantitative urine culture. Reviews, editorials, animal-only studies, and case reports without microbiome profiling were excluded.

3. Urinary microbiome

3.1. Sampling

Because the gastrointestinal, skin, genital tract, and lower urinary tract microbiota overlap substantially, sampling methods strongly influence data interpretation. Samples can be collected by a clean catch of mid-stream urine, transurethral catheterization (TUC), or suprapubic aspiration (SPA). Studies conducted in women showed good concordance between samples collected by TUC and SPA from the same individual, allowing for the substitution of the more uncomfortable and invasive SPA with TUC. Voided samples, such as those collected by mid-stream catch, showed a higher representation of both pathogenic and fastidious bacteria that are commonly present on the skin or in the vulvovaginal tract 5. Urethral swabbing and first-catch voided urine specimens showed similar distribution of bacterial genera and their proportions, eliminating the need for invasive sampling 19.

3.2. Composition

The first studies that overturned the long-held belief that urine from healthy individuals was sterile came in the early 2010s when culture-independent molecular methods were applied to study the composition of urine. In a landmark 2012 study, Wolfe et al. 5 used 16S rRNA gene sequencing and metaproteomics to detect and characterize bacterial DNA in the urine collected from asymptomatic adults by various sampling methods, showing that healthy urine contains diverse bacterial communities that standard culture misses because most of these microbes are low in abundance or fastidious]. The study used standard urine culturing techniques, light microscopy, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing to compare urine samples from 12 asymptomatic adult women and 11 culture-negative participants with urodynamic diseases to assess differences in urinary microbial growth. Discrepancies were also noted between growth on standard cultures and DNA obtained from 16S rRNA gene sequencing on urine from the same individual, even when sampled by different techniques, which demonstrates the high sensitivity of standard urine cultures to uropathogens but poor ability to isolate other commensal species with lower biomass 5.

The composition of the urinary microbiome appears to be influenced by several factors. Several studies have evaluated variation in microbial composition according to age, sex, urological conditions, urodynamic dysfunction, and catheter use.XX Several studies have evaluated variation in microbial composition according to age 19, 20, 21, sex 22, 23, 24, urological conditions, urodynamic dysfunction 22, 23, and catheter use 22.

3.2.1. Composition in healthy, asymptomatic individuals

The urinary microbiome of healthy, asymptomatic individuals is characterized by a complex mix of bacterial genera, with notable variability across sex and age. Studies have demonstrated a more diverse mix of genera among female participants compared to their male counterparts, with female samples having an average of 21 genera compared to 11.5 genera in males 6. Sex-related differences in urinary microbial composition have also been reported. The healthy female urinary microbiome has an abundance of Lactobacillus species, whereas a healthy male urinary microbiome is dominated by Corynebacterium, Streptococcus, and Staphylococcus species 22, 23, 24. Several additional taxa also appear to show sex-associated distribution patterns, such as Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes being common in females but being infrequent in male samples 3,22, 25. Genera such as Prevotella, Veillonella, and Aerococcus are a part of the core urinary microbiome for both men and women, with varying degrees of representation likely influenced by other factors 22.

The urinary microbiome also varies with age. Female participants generally exhibit a greater number of detected genera than male participants, with no significant difference noted in the number of genera in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Lactobacillus is more common in premenopausal women, and Mobiluncus in postmenopausal women 19. The decrease in Lactobacillus in postmenopausal women is perhaps better explained by vaginal atrophy and a decrease in estrogen with menopause, which could alter the urothelial and vaginal epithelium, influencing this change 20. Genera like Streptococcus were noted to increase in older men, whereas the abundance of Gardnerella and Acinetobacter decreased relatively with age in both genders 21. Because bladder cancer primarily affects older adults, age-related changes in the urinary microbiome are particularly relevant to understanding its development and progression.

It is unclear how significantly the microbiome changes with race and geographical regions, as most studies were either done using small sample sizes or heterogeneous populations. Studies from China and Nigeria that had patient populations belonging to a single ethnicity and geographical region showed a core urinary microbiome markedly different from that typically seen in studies from the United States or other heterogeneous studies 21, 26. These differences may reflect geographic variation in the urinary microbiome related to diet, environment, and lifestyle.

3.2.2. Impact of risk factors on the urinary microbiome

Smoking is a major risk factor for the development of bladder cancer. In a study comparing healthy men with men with bladder cancer, the effect of smoking on the urinary microbiome in healthy individuals was not significant 27. However, there was a change in the composition of the microbiome, with Bacteroidaceae, Erysipelotrichales, Lachnospiraceae, and Bacteroides being higher in smokers than non-smokers. These findings suggest that tobacco exposure may contribute to urinary dysbiosis 27. Genera like Sphingomonas, Acinetobacter, and Micrococcus have the ability to break down polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), a known carcinogen associated with cigarette smoke. Other PAH metabolizers, such as Enterobacter and Ralstonia, are also abundant in the urine of those with bladder cancer. The ability to metabolize PAH allows these species to dominate the urinary microbiome of smokers and would likely explain an increased presence in smokers or those with bladder cancer 28. However, these associations remain largely correlative. While smoking is an established causal risk factor for bladder cancer, it may independently alter both bladder cancer risk and urinary microbial composition, with enrichment of PAH-metabolizing bacteria representing a secondary ecological effect rather than a direct contributor to carcinogenesis. Additionally, tumor development itself may alter the bladder microenvironment through changes in inflammation, nutrient availability, or epithelial integrity, thereby selecting for microbial taxa capable of metabolizing environmental carcinogens. Further studies are needed to determine whether these microbial shifts contribute directly to carcinogenesis or simply reflect smoking-related and tumor-related ecological change.

A study based in Nigeria demonstrated a unique microbial profile within the urine of individuals infected with Schistosoma haematobium when compared to uninfected individuals 26. Veillonellaceae, Fusobacteriaceae, Lactobacillaceae, and Enterococcaceae were present in significantly higher concentrations in infected cases, while Oxalobacteraceae, Enterobacteriaceae, and Staphylococcaceae were significantly elevated in the urinary microbiome of healthy individuals]. At the time this review was conducted, no studies relating the urinary microbiome to arsenic exposure in humans could be found.

3.2.3. Chronic infections and lower urinary tract symptoms

Studies have shown that patients with neurogenic bladder tend to have greater proportions of members of Enterobacteriaceae 22, 23. This finding was consistent irrespective of gender. Lactobacillus crispatus, which is found in abundance in healthy, asymptomatic women, was notably absent among cultivated colonies in females with neurogenic bladders]. Males with neurogenic bladder were also found to have lower numbers of Corynebacterium species, which is otherwise a common genus in healthy asymptomatic males 22.

In a large, nested case-control study, Sutcliffe et al. 29 demonstrated a positive association between a history of gonorrhea and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) such as urinary retention, increased frequency, and urgency in men]. Extending this study, Michaud et al. 30 performed a large prospective study that demonstrated a nearly two-fold increase in bladder cancer risk in men with gonorrhea compared to men with no history of it 29,30. Other studies have demonstrated a clear variance in species in the urinary microbiome of those with LUTS and sexually transmitted infections, with organisms such as Prevotella and Sneathia species being almost unique to these individuals 9,25. Taking all this information into account, the causal contribution of these factors to carcinogenesis remains unclear. It is possible that gonorrhea and other sexually transmitted infections can increase chronic inflammatory conditions of the bladder or urodynamic disease, causing urinary retention that in turn increases the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs). This microbiome change could plausibly contribute to the persistence of UTIs due to an interplay between the microbiome species and uropathogens, assist in antibiotic resistance, or directly contribute to chronic inflammation of the bladder, thereby creating a pro-inflammatory environment that may favor carcinogenesis.

3.3. Association with bladder cancer

3.3.1. Potential mechanisms of carcinogenesis

While mechanisms such as chronic inflammation, disruption of epithelial barrier integrity, immune modulation, and production of carcinogenic metabolites have been extensively studied in other microbiome-associated malignancies, emerging evidence suggests that similar pathways may contribute to bladder cancer development.Persistent colonization by uropathogens can induce chronic inflammation within the bladder microenvironment. Activation of pattern recognition receptors such as Toll-like receptors on urothelial cells leads to downstream signaling through pathways including nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), resulting in production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Chronic inflammatory signaling promotes cellular proliferation, oxidative stress, and DNA damage, all of which may facilitate tumor initiation and progression 31, 32. Fusobacterium nucleatum, which has been identified in urinary microbiome studies, promotes tumor-associated inflammation through activation of NF-κB pathways and has been implicated in multiple epithelial cancers 33, 34.

Microbial metabolism can generate reactive oxygen species, reactive nitrogen species, and nitrosamines, all of which can induce DNA mutations and genomic instability. Escherichia coli strains harbor the pks genomic island, which encodes colibactin, a genotoxin capable of inducing DNA double-strand breaks 35. In addition, bacterial enzymes, such as β-glucuronidases produced by bacteria belonging to Clostridium spp. and Escherichia coli, may influence the metabolism of environmental carcinogens excreted in urine, potentially increasing local exposure of urothelial cells to activated carcinogenic compounds. These metabolic interactions may be particularly relevant in the bladder, where urine serves as a reservoir for xenobiotic metabolites derived from smoking and occupational exposures 36.The bladder urothelium normally functions as a protective barrier, preventing microbial adherence and invasion. However, certain bacterial species can disrupt epithelial integrity through the production of toxins, proteases, and other virulence factors that impair tight junctions and epithelial adhesion molecules. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli, for example, produces toxins such as hemolysin that disrupt epithelial cells and facilitate bacterial invasion. Loss of epithelial barrier function may increase mucosal permeability, facilitate microbial invasion, and enhance inflammatory responses. Persistent epithelial injury and regenerative proliferation may contribute to malignant transformation over time. 37

The microbiome may also influence antitumor immunity within the bladder. Microbial components and metabolites can shape the local immune landscape by altering dendritic cell activation, T-cell differentiation, and cytokine production. These effects may impact immune surveillance and tumor progression.

3.3.2. Signature urotypes in bladder cancer

Several studies have tried to establish a “urotype” associated with bladder cancer and have reported heterogeneous microbial profiles. The common theme seems to be a notable depletion in the dominant commensal in both men and women, which could have been protective in healthy adults 38. The phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were most represented in patients with bladder cancer, followed by Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, making up 98.53% of the total microbiota. The most frequent genera were Bacteroides, Escherichia–Shigella, Staphylococcus, and Enterococcus, representing 31.99% of the total microbiota 39. Smokers with bladder cancer often have an increased representation of Bacteroidaceae, Erysipelotrichales, and Lachnospiraceae 27. The bladder microbiome also appears to vary according to muscle-invasiveness status, an important prognostic feature in bladder cancer. Anoxybacillus, Massilia, Thermomonas, Brachybacterium, Micrococcus, Nocardioides, Larkinella, Jeotgalibacillus, and Geomicrobium were found to be increased in the urine of those with recurrent non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), potentially making their detection a surveillance tool for treatment response. Haemophilus, Veillonella, Bacteroides, and Faecalibacterium genera were more abundant in the urine of muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients 38, 40. Studies have also shown differences between the urinary microbiome and tumor tissue microbiome, with a significant difference in microbiome composition of urine and mucosal tissue sampling on beta diversity analysis 41. This finding may reflect niche-selection by tumor-associated metabolites or site-specific microbial adaptation, although mechanistic inference remains premature 42.

3.3.3. Lactobacillus as a protective agent against bladder carcinogenesis

Lactobacillus plays a key role in suppressing uropathogens and promoting immune surveillance through the generation of organic acids, hydrogen peroxide, and bacteriocins. Lactobacillus crispatus, which is a dominant commensal in healthy women and men, effectively inhibited the growth of Proteus by exerting an antibacterial effect through acidification of urine and biofilm inhibition 43. In women, vaginal Lactobacillus spp. may inhibit Neisseria gonorrheae epithelial interactions, suggesting a possible protective role against gonococcal colonization, which may reduce the risk of chronic LUTS 44. Loss of this organism and other commensals with age, hormonal imbalance, frequent antibiotic use, or their suppression by other uropathogens, causing dysbiosis in chronic UTIs and LUTS, may favor persistent inflammation, epithelial damage, and immune dysfunction, thereby promoting a microenvironment that may favor tumorigenesis and immune evasion.

3.4. Effect on and variability with treatment

The urinary microbiome appears to influence the way chemotherapeutic agents are metabolized in the bladder, affecting treatment outcomes 45. Antibiotic-induced dysbiosis, chronic UTIs along with the secondary metabolites they produce, and the presence of urodynamic diseases, may all result in an increased risk of carcinogenesis in the bladder 46.

3.4.1. Bacillus Calmette–Guérin

The influence of the urinary microbiome is evident in response to intravesical Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG), which remains the cornerstone of treatment for NMIBC. BCG efficacy relies on robust innate immune activation and recruitment of neutrophils, macrophages, and T cells. A favorable urinary microbiome, characterized by higher microbial diversity and increased abundance of Lactobacillus, appears to amplify these immune responses, whereas alterations in the urinary microbiome may blunt immune activation or promote immune tolerance, contributing to BCG failure and disease recurrence 47.

Serratia, Brochothrix, Negativicoccus, Escherichia–Shigella, and Pseudomonas are more common in the urine microbiomes of BCG responders compared to those who did not respond to BCG 40. Proteobacteria were common in patients undergoing BCG therapy who had a recurrence of NMIBC. The presence of Lactobacillus was once again protective, as it was more abundant in patients without recurrence 48.

3.4.2. Immune checkpoint inhibitors

Microbiome and immune system interactions may represent a critical and previously underrecognized determinant of immunotherapy responsiveness in bladder cancer. In particular, the microbiome has been proposed as a key biological contributor to heterogeneity in clinical responses to both intravesical BCG and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), beyond tumor-intrinsic factors such as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression or mutational burden 49. Increasing evidence supports a role for both the gut and urinary microbiota in modulating antitumor immune responses in bladder cancer 50. Associations between urinary microbial composition and immune checkpoint regulation support the functional relevance of urinary dysbiosis in cases of bladder cancer 51.

The gut microbiome provides the strongest existing evidence for microbiome-mediated modulation of ICI responsiveness. High microbial diversity and production of immunologically active metabolites, particularly short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) such as butyrate and propionate, enhance systemic antitumor immune responses by promoting dendritic cell maturation, increasing cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell function, and supporting effector cytokine production required for effective programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 blockade 50, 52. These metabolites exert their effects through epigenetic regulation, G-protein–coupled receptor signaling, and modulation of T-cell exhaustion pathways, directly influencing antitumor immunity 50, 52. This well-described interaction between the gut microbiome and the immune system provides a useful framework for understanding how the urinary microbiome may similarly influence immune responses within the bladder tumor microenvironment. Urinary microbes can interact directly with urothelial and immune cells through pattern-recognition receptors, including Toll-like receptors and nucleotide-binding and oligomerization domain-like receptors, leading to changes in cytokine signaling, antigen presentation, and immune cell recruitment 47. When microbial signaling is balanced, these interactions support effective innate immune activation; however, its disruption may promote chronic inflammation that favors immune suppression and reduced responsiveness to ICIs 50.

Converging evidence links microbial dysbiosis to both immune checkpoint pathway regulation and clinical outcomes in bladder cancer. In male patients with NMIBC, PD-L1-positive tumors exhibited significantly higher urinary microbial diversity compared to PD-L1-negative tumors, with a dose-response relationship observed that, as the number of PD-L1-positive cells increased, urinary microbial richness also increased 51.

Importantly, antibiotic-induced disruption of this microbial-immune axis translates directly to worse clinical outcomes in patients receiving ICIs. In patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, antibiotic use was associated with lower pathologic complete response rates (15% vs. 50%) and worse 24-month relapse-free survival (63% vs. 90%), with fluoroquinolones showing particularly poor outcomes 53. These findings demonstrate that a healthy, diverse microbiome is essential for optimal ICI responsiveness, and its disruption by antibiotics, whether affecting gut or urinary microbial communities, impairs the antitumor immune responses necessary for effective PD-1/PD-L1 blockade.

This integrated understanding raises several critical questions for future investigation, including whether baseline urinary or gut microbiome profiling can identify patients with microbial signatures predictive of both PD-L1 expression and ICI responsiveness. Furthermore, the potential for microbiome restoration strategies, such as fecal microbiota transplantation or targeted probiotics, to rescue ICI responsiveness in patients requiring antibiotics warrants investigation. Finally, these findings raise the question of whether antibiotic stewardship protocols should be specifically tailored for patients planned for or currently receiving immunotherapy.

4. Diagnostic/prognostic use of microbiome studies/clinical trials in progress

Intravesical instillations of Lactobacillus species have been researched as an alternative to BCG for the treatment of bladder cancer in animal models with success, with a reduction in pro-inflammatory state 54. Accurate assessment of the microbial profile of the urine, especially in those with more than one unmodifiable risk factor, can help track any changes in the microbiome, perhaps even using it as an early sign of a developing tumor microenvironment. Exploring microbial deficiencies in specific urotypes will allow us to specifically replenish the urine microbiome in an attempt to restore “eubiosis.”

Given the significant overlap between the urogenital and colonic microbiomes, it would be interesting to observe any influence that changes in the stool microbiome have on the urinary microbiome. If there is significant bacterial translocation through the bloodstream or interstitium between the two systems, rather than a passive contiguous spread of microbes, one could attempt to target urine eubiosis through nutritional interventions that would then heal gut dysbiosis. Another option would be fecal microbiota transfer from healthy individuals to those with bladder cancer. This could also be attempted to treat chronic LUTS or recurrent UTIs if they are found in the future to be purely driven by urinary dysbiosis.

Due consideration should also be given to antibiotic use, which can kill beneficial commensals. Narrowing the antibiotics to specifically target uropathogens and spare commensals can help prevent antibiotic-induced dysbiosis, which can take months to heal. Organisms that are slow metabolizers or inhibit local degradation of chemotherapeutic agents can be used as intravesical adjuvants, potentially leading to a decrease in systemic side effects due to the lower dose of antineoplastic agents being used in this scenario. In contrast, fast metabolizer species can be used as adjuvants in patients receiving toxic chemotherapeutic or other medical regimens that can concentrate in the bladder, leading to cystitis, in an attempt to reduce toxicity. Clinical trials and prospective studies are needed on this subject to better determine the feasibility of these ideas.

5. Currently active clinical trials exploring the role of the urinary microbiome in bladder cancer

Currently active clinical trials exploring the role of urinary microbiome in bladder cancer are summarized in Table 1. There are currently five active clinical trials exploring the role of urinary microbiome in patients with bladder cancer, of which three are currently recruiting patients. The studies are primarily aiming to evaluate whether certain microbial signatures predict response to BCG and chemotherapy, predict risk of relapse, and overall prognosis. Also, some studies are trying to create a local urinary microbiome registry that may facilitate the development of more personalized therapeutic strategies for patients with bladder cancer in the future.

6. Conclusion

There is growing evidence associating alterations in the urinary microbial ecosystem with bladder cancer. Across multiple studies, patients with bladder cancer demonstrate consistent shifts in urinary bacterial communities, including loss of potentially protective organisms such as Lactobacillus and enrichment of taxa like Fusobacterium, Prevotella, Acinetobacter, and Streptococcus, organisms known to drive inflammation or alter epithelial biology in other cancers. These patterns are not random; instead, they cluster into recognizable community types that appear to correlate with tumor presence, recurrence risk, and even response to intravesical therapies.

While very intriguing, we are just beginning to understand this association and possible causation. Most existing studies are small, cross-sectional, and methodologically heterogeneous, differing in urine collection techniques, sequencing platforms, and contamination controls. Antibiotic use can substantially alter microbiome composition, diversity, and resilience, and many studies used only a short antibiotic washout period for their participants. Because urine is a low-biomass sample, even minor technical differences can dramatically influence results, which likely explains why no single microbial signature has yet emerged as “definitive.” While there is little doubt that there is a urinary microbiome, it still remains unclear whether its alteration contributes to malignant transformation or simply reflects changes in the bladder microenvironment created by the tumor itself.

Currently active clinical trials are trying to answer some of these questions. Knowing the prognostic significance of the microbial profile and having a local registry will pave the way for personalized bladder cancer treatment, including treatments to positively modify the urinary microbiome, improving outcomes in bladder cancer patients. If found to predict risk of recurrence, altering the urinary microbiome could be a safe and cost-effective solution to prevent recurrence of bladder cancer. It will also be very interesting to see if we can change the urinary microbiome to reduce the risk of bladder cancer in patients at risk. Urinary microbiome profiles could become powerful non-invasive biomarkers for early detection, risk stratification, and surveillance.

In short, bladder cancer can no longer be viewed purely as a disease of malignant urothelial cells. It appears to exist within a dynamic microbial ecosystem that may influence its initiation, progression, and treatment response. Understanding this ecosystem is not merely an academic exercise; it has the potential to fundamentally change how we screen, treat, and ultimately prevent bladder cancer.

References
  1. Berg G, Rybakova D, Fischer D, Cernava T, Vergès MCC, Charles T, et al. Microbiome definition re-visited: old concepts and new challenges. Microbiome. 2020;8(1). doi:10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0
  2. Lens on Leeuwenhoek. Wrote Letter L-135 of 1683-09-17 to Francis Aston about saliva, nasal hairs and blackheads, skin, pores, calluses, and cleaning teeth; the discovery of bacteria in tartar. Published September 17, 1683. Available from: http://lensonleeuwenhoek.net/content/wrote-letter-135-of-1683-09-17-francis-aston-bacteria-in-tartar
  3. Nelson DE, Van Der Pol B, Dong Q, et al. Characteristic Male Urine Microbiomes Associate with Asymptomatic Sexually Transmitted Infection. Valdivia RH, ed. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(11):e14116. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014116
  4. Siddiqui H, Nederbragt AJ, Lagesen K, Jeansson SL, Jakobsen KS. Assessing diversity of the female urine microbiota by high throughput sequencing of 16S rDNA amplicons. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2180-11-244
  5. Wolfe AJ, Toh E, Shibata N, et al. Evidence of Uncultivated Bacteria in the Adult Female Bladder. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(4):1376-1383. doi:10.1128/jcm.05852-11
  6. Lewis DA, Brown R, Williams J, et al. The human urinary microbiome; bacterial DNA in voided urine of asymptomatic adults. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013;3. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2013.00041
  7. Ghittoni R. The role of human papillomaviruses in carcinogenesis. ecancer. 2015;9. doi:10.3332/ecancer.2015.526
  8. Chen H, Jiao J, Wei M, et al. Metagenomic analysis of the interaction between the gut microbiota and colorectal cancer: a paired-sample study based on the GMrepo database. Gut Pathog. 2022;14(1). doi:10.1186/s13099-022-00527-8
  9. Hsu FC, Yen Y. Tumor Mutational Load: A Novel Predictor for Clinical Benefit of Pembrolizumab. Clinical Cancer Research. 2024;30(17):3652-3654. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-1261
  10. Sheikh M, Domingues A, Alcala K, et al. Regular use of pharmaceutical opioids and subsequent risk of cancer: a prospective cohort study and Mendelian randomization analysis. eClinicalMedicine. 2025;89:103439. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103439
  11. National Cancer Institute. Cancer of the Urinary Bladder - Cancer Stat Facts. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/urinb.html
  12. Flammia RS, Tufano A, Chierigo F, et al. The Effect of Sex on Disease Stage and Survival after Radical Cystectomy in Non-Urothelial Variant-Histology Bladder Cancer. JCM. 2023;12(5):1776. doi:10.3390/jcm12051776
  13. Li YH, Ou YC, Tung MC, et al. Gender disparities in bladder cancer: A population-based study on life expectancy and health spending in Asia. Zahir M, ed. PLoS One. 2025;20(6):e0323803. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0323803
  14. Chandrasekar T. Bladder Cancer. Merck Manual Professional Edition. Posted February, 2025. Available from: https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/genitourinary-disorders/genitourinary-cancers/bladder-cancer
  15. National Cancer Institute. Bladder Cancer Causes and Risk Factors. Updated May 12, 2025. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/types/bladder/causes-risk-factors
  16. DeGeorge KC, Holt HR, Hodges SC. Bladder Cancer: Diagnosis and Treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2017;96(8):507–514. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29094888/
  17. Mostafa MH, Sheweita SA, O’Connor PJ. Relationship between Schistosomiasis and Bladder Cancer. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12(1):97-111. doi:10.1128/cmr.12.1.97
  18. United States Preventive Services Taskforce. Final Recommendation in Statement: Bladder Cancer in Adults: Screening. Posted August 15, 2011.Available from: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/bladder-cancer-in-adults-screening
  19. Curtiss N, Balachandran A, Krska L, Peppiatt-Wildman C, Wildman S, Duckett J. Age, menopausal status and the bladder microbiome. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2018;228:126-129. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.06.011
  20. Tang J. Microbiome in the urinary system—a review. AIMS Microbiology. 2017;3(2):143-154. doi:10.3934/microbiol.2017.2.143
  21. Qin J, Shi X, Xu J, et al. Characterization of the Genitourinary Microbiome of 1,165 Middle-Aged and Elderly Healthy Individuals. Front Microbiol. 2021;12. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.673969
  22. Fouts DE, Pieper R, Szpakowski S, et al. Integrated next-generation sequencing of 16S rDNA and metaproteomics differentiate the healthy urine microbiome from asymptomatic bacteriuria in neuropathic bladder associated with spinal cord injury. J Transl Med. 2012;10(1). doi:10.1186/1479-5876-10-174
  23. Groah SL, Pérez-Losada M, Caldovic L, et al. Redefining Healthy Urine: A Cross-Sectional Exploratory Metagenomic Study of People With and Without Bladder Dysfunction. Journal of Urology. 2016;196(2):579-587. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.088
  24. Modena BD, Milam R, Harrison F, et al. Changes in Urinary Microbiome Populations Correlate in Kidney Transplants With Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy Documented in Early Surveillance Biopsies. American Journal of Transplantation. 2017;17(3):712-723. doi:10.1111/ajt.14038
  25. Dong Q, Nelson DE, Toh E, et al. The Microbial Communities in Male First Catch Urine Are Highly Similar to Those in Paired Urethral Swab Specimens. Gray RH, ed. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(5):e19709. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019709
  26. Adebayo AS, Survayanshi M, Bhute S, et al. The microbiome in urogenital schistosomiasis and induced bladder pathologies. Hsieh MH, ed. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(8):e0005826. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005826
  27. Ma W, Zhang W, Shen L, et al. Can Smoking Cause Differences in Urine Microbiome in Male Patients With Bladder Cancer? A Retrospective Study. Front Oncol. 2021;11. doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.677605
  28. Bukavina L, Isali I, Ginwala R, et al. Global Meta-analysis of Urine Microbiome: Colonization of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon–degrading Bacteria Among Bladder Cancer Patients. European Urology Oncology. 2023;6(2):190-203. doi:10.1016/j.euo.2023.02.004
  29. Sutcliffe S, Giovannucci E, De Marzo AM, Willett WC, Platz EA. Sexually Transmitted Infections, Prostatitis, Ejaculation Frequency, and the Odds of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2005;162(9):898-906. doi:10.1093/aje/kwi299
  30. Michaud DS, Platz EA, Giovannucci E. Gonorrhoea and male bladder cancer in a prospective study. Br J Cancer. 2006;96(1):169-171. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603510
  31. Olson P, Hunstad D. Subversion of Host Innate Immunity by Uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Pathogens. 2016;5(1):2. doi:10.3390/pathogens5010002
  32. Hou Y, Lv Z, Hu Q, Zhu A, Niu H. The immune mechanisms of the urinary tract against infections. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025;15. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2025.1540149
  33. Bučević Popović V, Šitum M, Chow CET, Chan LS, Roje B, Terzić J. The urinary microbiome associated with bladder cancer. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29054-w
  34. Wang N, Fang JY. Fusobacterium nucleatum, a key pathogenic factor and microbial biomarker for colorectal cancer. Trends in Microbiology. 2023;31(2):159-172. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2022.08.010
  35. Vizcaino MI, Crawford JM. The colibactin warhead crosslinks DNA. Nature Chem. 2015;7(5):411-417. doi:10.1038/nchem.2221
  36. Cheng KW, Tseng CH, Chen IJ, et al. Inhibition of gut microbial β-glucuronidase effectively prevents carcinogen-induced microbial dysbiosis and intestinal tumorigenesis. Pharmacological Research. 2022;177:106115. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106115
  37. Nagamatsu K, Hannan TJ, Guest RL, et al. Dysregulation ofEscherichia coliα-hemolysin expression alters the course of acute and persistent urinary tract infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(8). doi:10.1073/pnas.1500374112
  38. Chipollini J, Wright JR, Nwanosike H, et al. Characterization of urinary microbiome in patients with bladder cancer: Results from a single-institution, feasibility study. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations. 2020;38(7):615-621. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.04.014
  39. Parra-Grande M, Oré-Arce M, Martínez-Priego L, et al. Profiling the Bladder Microbiota in Patients With Bladder Cancer. Front Microbiol. 2022;12. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.718776
  40. Hussein AA, Elsayed AS, Durrani M, et al. Investigating the association between the urinary microbiome and bladder cancer: An exploratory study. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations. 2021;39(6):370.e9-370.e19. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.12.011
  41. Kang C, Lee J, Baek MG, et al. Urinary microbiome in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: impact of sample types and sex differences. BMC Microbiol. 2025;25(1). doi:10.1186/s12866-025-04367-9
  42. Mansour B, Monyók Á, Makra N, et al. Bladder cancer-related microbiota: examining differences in urine and tissue samples. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-020-67443-2
  43. Szczerbiec D, Piechocka J, Głowacki R, Torzewska A. Organic Acids Secreted by Lactobacillus spp. Isolated from Urine and Their Antimicrobial Activity against Uropathogenic Proteus mirabilis. Molecules. 2022;27(17):5557. doi:10.3390/molecules27175557
  44. Spurbeck RR, Arvidson CG. Inhibition of Neisseria gonorrhoeaeEpithelial Cell Interactions by Vaginal Lactobacillus Species. Infect Immun. 2008;76(7):3124-3130. doi:10.1128/iai.00101-08
  45. Wang B, Nandwana D, Sindhani M, et al. Genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of urinary microbiome: Pathway for personalized medicine. JCO. 2025;43(5_suppl):822-822. doi:10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.822
  46. Trần TA, Lee HY, Choi HW. Metabolite-mediated mechanisms linking the urinary microbiome to bladder cancer. Journal of Microbiology. 2025;63(11):e2509001. doi:10.71150/jm.2509001
  47. Xu XF, Cui JL, Li WH, et al. Host-microbiota interactions in genitourinary cancer immunotherapy. Seminars in Cancer Biology. 2025;115:1-15. doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2025.07.005
  48. Sweis RF, Golan S, Barashi N, et al. Association of the commensal urinary microbiome with response to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) immunotherapy in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. JCO. 2019;37(7_suppl):423-423. doi:10.1200/jco.2019.37.7_suppl.423
  49. Bourgi A, Bruyère F, Rusch E. Microbiome and immunotherapy in bladder cancer: The missing link. The French Journal of Urology. 2025;35(9):102922. doi:10.1016/j.fjurol.2025.102922
  50. Winslow TB, Gupta S, Vaddaraju VS, Guercio BJ, Sahasrabudhe DM. The Microbiome and Genitourinary Cancers: A New Frontier. Cancers. 2025;17(22):3606. doi:10.3390/cancers17223606
  51. Chen C, Huang Z, Huang P, et al. Urogenital Microbiota:Potentially Important Determinant of PD-L1 Expression in Male Patients with Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. BMC Microbiol. 2022;22(1). doi:10.1186/s12866-021-02407-8
  52. Peng Z, Zhuang J, Shen B. The role of microbiota in tumorigenesis, progression and treatment of bladder cancer. Microbiome Res Rep. 2023;3(1). doi:10.20517/mrr.2023.47
  53. Pederzoli F, Bandini M, Raggi D, et al. Is There a Detrimental Effect of Antibiotic Therapy in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab? European Urology. 2021;80(3):319-322. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2021.05.018
  54. Seow SW, Cai S, Rahmat JN, et al. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GGinduces tumor regression in mice bearing orthotopic bladder tumors. Cancer Science. 2010;101(3):751-758. doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01426.x
  55. Poyet C. The Role of Microbiome in BCG Responsiveness (SILENTEMPIRE). National Library of Medicine. NCT05204199. Updated April 5, 2024. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05204199
  56. Alfano M. Predictive Role of Microbiome in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma. National Library of Medicine. NCT06675656. Updated November 5, 2024. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06675656
  57. Yonsei University. Development of Urologic Registry for Personalized Medicine in Patients With Urologic Malignant Diseases by Analyzing Microbiome National Library of Medicine. NCT04625556. Updated January 31, 2023. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04625556
  58. Regina Elena Cancer Institute. Urinary Microbiome Differences in Bladder Cancer, Benign Urinary Diseases and Healthy Counterparts Adult Male Population. National Library of Medicine. NCT06992986. Updated May 28, 2025. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06992986
  59. Zeng S. Analyzing the Urine During BCG Instillation in Bladder Cancer Patients for Disease Follow up. National Library of Medicine. NCT06153849. Updated December 1, 2023. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06153849
Share
Back to top
Bladder, Electronic ISSN: 2327-2120 Print ISSN: TBA, Published by POL Scientific