POL Scientific / Bladder / Volume 8 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.14440/bladder.2021.825
Cite this article
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
News and Announcements
View All

Does deep brain stimulation improve Parkinson’s disease-related lower urinary tract symptoms and voiding dysfunction?

Alexandra L. Tabakin Hari S.G.R. Tunuguntla
Show Less
1 Division of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
Bladder 2021 , 8(2), 1–8; https://doi.org/10.14440/bladder.2021.825
Submitted: 18 February 2021 | Revised: 2 May 2021 | Accepted: 9 May 2021 | Published: 27 August 2021
© 2021 by the Author(s). Licensee POL Scientific, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

Parkinson’s disease (PD), caused by degeneration of dopaminergic neurons, leads to motor and autonomic symptoms. A large proportion of PD patients experience lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and voiding dysfunction, associated with poor quality of life. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an adjunctive therapy used in combination with medication for Parkinsonian motor symptoms and is currently being explored to treat PD-related LUTS. This review discusses the current literature on the effects of DBS on lower urinary tract function and whether this modality can be used to modulate PD-related LUTS and voiding dysfunction.

deep brain stimulation
lower urinary tract symptoms
Parkinson’s disease
voiding dysfunction


Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a debilitating disease caused by the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons within the basal ganglia of the brain, which play a role in controlling movement and autonomic processes, including micturition [1]. PD is traditionally characterized by motor symptoms including akinesia, rigidity, postural instability, and tremors [2,3]. Between 27% to 86% of PD patients will experience some type of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or voiding dysfunction [3]. Voiding dysfunction in PD may be due to poor vesicosphincteric coordination with delayed or incomplete sphincter relaxation or impaired bladder contractility. PD-related LUTS adversely affect quality of life and may result in early institutionalization. Urinary symptoms can precede motor symptoms and may be an indicator of disease progression in those with early-stage PD [4].
In recent years, there has been significant interest on the impact of the deep brain stimulation (DBS) on PD-associated LUTS and voiding dysfunction and its possible utilization as a therapeutic tool. DBS first began as a technique in animal models to localize cerebral functions [5] but is now an established adjunctive treatment for improving motor symptoms in PD patients [6]. The use of DBS to improve urinary function was discovered incidentally in subjects undergoing DBS for other diseases [7]. Both animal and human studies have revealed promising results regarding the ability of DBS to modulate micturition in PD [1-3,5,7-21]. However, there is currently a paucity of original studies detailing the impact of DBS on LUTS and voiding dysfunction in PD patients.
In this non-systematic review, we summarize the current literature on the effects of DBS on the storage and voiding functions of the lower urinary tract in patients with PD and discuss the implications of these findings for future therapies.


Overview of normal micturition

Normal micturition involves a complex series of neural networks within both the autonomic and central nervous systems, which coordinate both the storage and emptying of urine. The bladder is a hollow visceral organ with proprioceptors that sense bladder stretch. As the bladder fills and distends, detrusor stretch receptors send afferent signals to the spinal cord, which incites sympathetic outflow and the activation of efferent motor neurons in Onuf’s nucleus. The sympathetic signaling triggers the release of norepinephrine, which stimulates ß3-adrenergic receptors in the detrusor, allowing for relaxation. The somatic signaling incites the release of acetylcholine, which stimulates nicotinic receptors allowing the rhabdosphincter to contract and maintain continence. During this process, parasympathetic activity is reciprocally inhibited [22].
When the bladder fills past its threshold, afferent receptors travel through the sacral spinal cord via the pelvic nerve to the periaqueductal grey matter (PAG), which is under the control of many high cortical centers including the prefrontal cortex, thalamus, and limbic structures. Neurons in the PAG then relay signals to the pontine micturition center (PMC) or Barrington’s nucleus [5]. The PMC integrates sensory information from the bladder with higher-level cortical structures [23]. When deemed appropriate to void by cortical input, the PMC initiates micturition by signaling to parasympathetic preganglionic neurons, which synapse in the sacral spinal cord with postganglionic neurons in the pelvic plexus. These neurons release acetylcholine, which activates M2 and M3 receptors in the urothelium to produce bladder contractions. In this phase of micturition, sympathetic and somatic pathways are inhibited, allowing for voluntary relaxation of the external urethral sphincter, thereby initiating voiding [23].

PD-associated LUTS and voiding dysfunction

LUTS are the most common autonomic symptoms in PD [1,24]. Storage LUTS (nocturia, urgency, frequency, and urgency incontinence) are more common in the early phase of the disease [2], whereas voiding symptoms are more apparent in the later phase [25]. The etiology of voiding dysfunction in PD is multifactorial [26]. One key aspect is the development of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction secondary to degradation of suprapontine dopaminergic neural pathways involved in micturition. Other age-related pathologies affecting micturition are also common in PD patients. Over 36% of patients have bladder outlet obstruction, while many others experience symptoms secondary to pelvic organ prolapse, BPH, and hormonal deficiencies [26]. Furthermore, motor symptoms may prevent patients from toileting themselves appropriately in a timely manner.
Most patients with PD tend to have post-void residuals within “normal limits” (< 100 ml) [26,27]. On urodynamics, detrusor overactivity (DO), either terminal or phasic, is the most common urodynamic finding, but detrusor underactivity can also be observed [2,26]. Other common urodynamic abnormalities include high resting urethral pressures and uninhibited external sphincter relaxation [27]. Rarely, PD patients can demonstrate pseudo-detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia, likely due to bradykinesia of the external urethral sphincter [27].


DBS is a surgical procedure used to elicit chemical and electrical changes in the brain without destroying neural tissue [28]. Although the physiologic mechanisms remain elusive, it is postulated that DBS interrupts pathological oscillations, releases neuroprotective growth factors, and promotes neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity in order to modulate components of neural activity, including micturition [29]. To perform DBS, electrodes are surgically implanted into specific structures of the brain. Electrical stimuli are delivered to those regions, disrupting signaling locally and in associated networks [30]. The efficacy or particular effect of DBS can vary depending on the targeted anatomy or the spatial relationship of the stimulated electrical field [1,31]. DBS has been associated with an overall adverse event rate of up to 86%, many of which are reversible. These adverse events include but not limited to speech and gait difficulties, depression, cognitive disabilities, weight gain, urinary incontinence, urinary retention, urinary tract infection, surgical site infection, hemorrhage, and rarely, death [17,18,32-35].
The use of DBS in Parkinson’s disease began in 2002 after its FDA approval as an adjunctive therapy in PD patients with symptoms uncontrolled by pharmacologic agents alone [36]. Bilateral DBS of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) [37] and globus pallidus interna (GPi), the two most common sites for DBS implantation, have been demonstrated to improve motor symptoms in PD patients [28]. In a randomized trial of 156 severe PD patients randomized to bilateral DBS of the STN (STN-DBS) and medical therapy or medical therapy alone, those who underwent STN-DBS had a greater improvement in motor symptoms than medication alone [35]. Moreover, the combination of medical therapy and DBS may lessen the number of levodopa equivalents needed [6].


Several groups have studied the impact of DBS on lower urinary tract symptoms and voiding dysfunction in PD patients, including increased urinary frequency, nocturia, urgency, urinary incontinence, incomplete emptying, and its effect on quality of life. These results are summarized in Table 1.

Lower urinary tract symptoms and voiding dysfunction

While DBS has proven effective for improving motor symptoms in many levodopa-responsive patients, subjective effects on urinary symptoms in patients with severe PD have had variable results. A survey of PD patients comparing those who underwent DBS (n = 220) with those who did not (n = 196) showed significant improvements in frequency, urgency, incontinence, and overactive bladder symptom score in the DBS groups. Interestingly, these improvements were more substantial in female patients when compared to males [21]. In the EuroInf study, a multi-center, open label prospective study of 60 patients with PD, after a mean follow-up of 6 months, STN-DBS was associated with decreased urinary urgency, frequency, and nocturia [9]. These findings were supported by the subsequent EuroInf 2 study which prospectively compared non-motor symptoms in PD patients who underwent STN-DBS (n = 101) with intrajejunal levodopa infusion (n = 33) and apomorphine (n = 39). After a follow-up of 6 months, significant improvements in urinary symptoms including urgency, frequency, nocturia (P = 0.001), and sexual function (P = 0.020) as measured by the Nonmotor symptom scale were only seen in the STN-DBS group [8].
Other studies have demonstrated less subjective clinical improvement in LUTS. In one small report on 30 PD patients, 24 of which had urinary urgency, 30% had symptomatic improvement while 70% had no change or worsening in their urgency after DBS. Of 26 subjects with nocturia, only 12% felt subjective improvement after DBS compared to 88% with no change or worsening nocturia [38]. Winge et al. performed a prospective study of 16 PD patients who underwent STN-DBS where LUTS were assessed pre- and post-operatively using two validated questionnaires, the international prostate symptom score (IPSS) and the Danish prostate symptom score (DanPSS). While patients demonstrated improved motor symptoms after STN-DBS, there was no change in overall LUTS. However, when stratified by symptom type, patients reported decreased overactive bladder symptoms at both 3 and 6 months post-operatively. There was a significant improvement in bothersome daytime frequency, nocturia, and urgency (DanPSS questions 5–8) after 3 months, but these improvements diminished after 6 months. Interestingly, the number of patients with severe bladder symptoms as reported by DanPSS score > 10 initially increased after 3 months but then decreased after 6 months [39]. On a subsequent analysis, Winge et al., compared advanced PD patients who underwent either conventional medical treatment (CMT) with STN-DBS, CMT with an apomorphine pump, or CMT alone. The three treatment groups did not demonstrate any differences with respect to their total IPSS or DanPSS scores, but DBS patients reported less nocturia and less bother from nocturia. DanPSS scores also correlated with DBS duration, but not with age or disease duration [6]. These mixed results may be attributed to the fact that LUTS may become more apparent in patients after their motor symptoms improve with DBS. DBS may also alter coping strategies that patients use to manage their LUTS [39].

Urinary incontinence

The development of urinary incontinence has been associated with DBS; some reports attribute incontinence to the surgical procedure [40] or to disease progression [41]. One small study of 30 PD patients reported that only 21% of patients had improved continence after DBS, whereas 79% worsened or had no change in symptoms [38]. Conversely, one study of advanced PD patients who underwent STN-DBS demonstrated that both male and female patients had significantly improved urinary incontinence and frequency after 12 months. Those who underwent DBS of the GPi (GPi-DBS) also shared these improvements but did not reach statistical significance. There was no difference in either group with respect to impaired mobility urinary incontinence stemming from Parkinsonian-related immobility [19].
Table 1. Summary of effects of DBS on LUTS.
Parameter of bladder function Author Year Study population Key findings
LUTS, voiding dysfunction Zong et al. [21] 2019 307 males and 109 females with PD
  • DBS associated with improved OAB-SS, urinary frequency, incontinence, and urgency
  • No changes in nocturia, feeling of incomplete emptying, or dysuria
  • Females demonstrated greater improvement in AUA-SS, OAB-SS and QoL scores than men
LUTS, QoL Dafsari et al. [9] 2016 35 males and 25 females with PD undergoing STN-DBS
  • STN-DBS associated with significantly improved urinary frequency, nocturia, and urgency as measured by the Non-Motor Symptom Scale
  • STN-DBS associated with 47% improvement in QoL scores as measured by Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire
LUTS Dafsari et al. [8] 2019 173 patients with PD with PD; STN-DBS (n = 101), intrajejunal levodopa infusion (n = 33), or apomorphine (n = 39)
  • STN-DBS group associated with significant improvement in urinary symptoms and sexual function, which was not demonstrated in the other groups
Urinary incontinence, LUTS Vishwajit et al. [38] 2009 30 patients with PD, 15 patients with essential tremor with DBS
  • In PD patients, DBS associated with 21% improvement in incontinence, 30% improvement in urgency, and 12% nocturia, whereas 79%, 70%, and 88% reported worsening or no change in symptoms, respectively.
LUTS, urinary incontinence Witte et al. [19] 2018 128 patients with PD; STN-DBS (n = 63), GPi-DBS (n = 65)
  • STN-DBS associated with significant improvement in frequency and incontinence
  • GPi-DBS associated with non-significant improvement in frequency and incontinence
  • No change in nocturia or incontinence due to lack of mobility from PD

Quality of life

Voiding dysfunction is associated with poor quality of life in PD patients [4]. In a prospective trial of 33 PD patients who underwent DBS of either the STN (n = 20) or GPi (n = 13), DBS significantly improved quality of life scores in the overall group. When stratified by DBS target location, a quality of life benefit was only demonstrated in STN-DBS patients [13]. Dafsari et al. also reported that patients undergoing STN-DBS exhibited a 47% increase in quality of life, as measured by the Parkinson’s disease questionnaire (PDQ-8) [9].


Several groups have examined the objective impact of DBS on various cerebral target regions by measuring urodynamic outcomes. These results are summarized in Table 2.

Basal ganglia: subthalamic nucleus and globus pallidus interna

The basal ganglia likely have a role in inhibiting the spino-bulbo-spinal micturition reflex [3]. The STN [37] is a component of the basal ganglia that is typically tonically inhibited by the globus pallidus externa (GPe). The STN modulates the downstream activity of the GPi and substantia nigra pars reticulata [35]. Those structures then communicate with the thalamic nuclei, frontal cortex, supplementary motor area and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [11]. In PD, the tonic inhibition of the GPe is diminished, leading to the development of motor symptoms. When not taking dopaminergic medications, bilateral STN-DBS in PD patients has been shown to have a sustained improvement motor of symptoms in such as tremor, rigidity, and dyskinesia [42].
DBS of the basal ganglia has yielded interesting results with respect to its impact on micturition. An early model in cats showed that high frequency STN-DBS of 50 Hertz or higher inhibited the micturition reflex via bladder relaxation and sphincter contraction [3]. A subsequent model of unilateral STN-DBS in pigs chemically induced to have Parkinsonian features exhibited decreased bladder compliance and increased pressure at maximal cystometric capacity (MCC) when stimulators were turned to the OFF state [43]. These studies provided early evidence that DBS could effectively modify urinary function [3,43].
STN- and GPi-DBS effects on urodynamics in humans with PD and other movement disorders have been evaluated in small studies, many of which report promising findings. Finazzi-Agro et al. retrospectively examined 5 patients with PD between 9 and 12 months after STN-DBS. All patients had detrusor overactivity with DBS in both the ON and OFF states; however, the bladder volume triggering a detrusor contraction was increased in the ON state. Bladder capacity also significantly increased from a median of 130 to 320 ml when transitioning from the OFF to the ON state [2]. Seif et al. confirmed these findings in their study of 16 PD patients with STN-DBS that were examined 6 to 29 months after stimulator implantation. Overall, bladder capacity, compliance, and time to first desire to void decreased when the stimulator was turned OFF. When the stimulator was turned back ON, time to first desire to void and bladder capacity both increased while compliance normalized. Moreover, detrusor overactivity was only observed when the stimulator was turned on OFF [15]. Herzog et al. compared STN-DBS in the ON and OFF states in 11 PD patients using positron emission tomography (PET). During bladder filling, bladder volume at first desire to void was decreased in the OFF compared to the ON state. The filling phase in the OFF state was also associated with increased activity in the lateral frontal cortex, which may indicate the cortex’s attempt to suppress undesired voiding at low bladder volumes [11]. These results may be attributed to STN-DBS’s role in normalizing the perception and processing of afferent information from the bladder, such as bladder filling, by the PAG, insula, and thalamus [44].
Other groups have reported more equivocal or detrimental results. One prospective study of 16 PD patients with STN-DBS did not demonstrate any significant changes on urodynamic studies before and after implantation after a median follow up of 6 months [39]. Mordasini et al. reported on 11 patients with severe dystonia who prospectively underwent GPi-DBS implantation. Urodynamic evaluation when DBS was turned ON revealed decreased maximum flow rate and increased postvoid residual, although DO was absent in all patients, 4 of whom demonstrated DO preoperatively [14].
The small sample size of these studies highlights the need for larger randomized trials to fully understand the objective bladder improvements in PD patients who undergo DBS of the basal ganglia. Results from these studies will be critical in further elucidating the uncertain role of the basal ganglia in the regulation of micturition.


The thalamus is a collection of nuclei located between the cerebral cortex and brainstem. It primarily functions in processing and integrating sensory information. During micturition, it is suspected that the thalamus filters afferent information which is then relayed to the insula and anterior cingulate cortex for higher cortical processing [45,46]. Studies have demonstrated activation of the thalamus in both the storage [45] and voiding phases of micturition [46]. DBS of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus has been successful in improving tremors in PD patients, but its clinical effects on voiding are largely unknown [47]. In a small study of 7 patients with essential tremor, DBS of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus in the ON state decreased bladder capacity at the first desire and strong desire to void as well as at MCC. These effects were more profound for urologically asymptomatic patients with bilateral rather than unilateral DBS [12].


DBS of brainstem structures in PD patients has been successful in improving motor symptoms. For example, the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) degenerates in PD, and DBS of the PPN (PPN-DBS) has been shown to improve gait dysfunction in PD patients [7,16]. Several structures of the brainstem, such as the PMC and PAG have well-established roles in micturition. Other brainstem components are also involved in both bladder storage and emptying, although the exact mechanisms are unclear. More specifically, the locus coeruleus (LC) is a key region of the PMC that plays a crucial role in relaying signals to the sacral spinal cord to initiate voiding [1]. Conversely, the rostral pontine reticular nucleus (PnO) serves in inhibiting the PMC [1]. Some of these structures may degenerate in PD [48], making them a suitable target for DBS to improve urinary function.
In a report of rats undergoing saline infusion to induce continuous filling and voiding cycles, Green et al. demonstrated that DBS of the PAG (PAG-DBS) prior to voiding inhibited detrusor contractions during which both external urethral sphincter tonic contraction and continence were maintained. Voiding was suppressed for the duration of the stimulation period (approximately 7 min) but resumed once stimulation was turned OFF. PAG-DBS also improved MCC [10]. These findings were corroborated in two other rat studies. Stone et al. reported that electrical stimulation of the ventrolateral PAG and tegmentum ventral and lateral to the PAG in rats reversibly inhibited normal voiding.
Table 2. Summary of effects of DBS on urodynamic parameters.
Location of DBS placement Author Year Study population Key findings
Thalamus STN Dalmose et al. [43] 2004 5 Göttingen minipigs with Parkinsonian features induced by MPTP
  • When DBS was turned off during the storage phase, bladder capacity minimally decreased, and bladder compliance significantly decreased
    Finazzi-Agro et al. [2] 2003 3 males and 2 females with PD
  • DBS associated with increased bladder capacity and volume triggering bladder contraction
  • Minimal decrease in amplitude of DO contractions
    Seif et al. [15] 2004 7 males and 9 females with idiopathic PD
  • DBS associated with increased bladder capacity, increased time to first desire to void, and normalization of bladder capacity
  • No detrusor activity seen after DBS
  • When DBS was turned OFF, bladder capacity, compliance, and time to first desire to void decreased
    Herzog et al. [11] 2006 5 males and 5 females with idiopathic PD
  • DBS associated with increased bladder capacity at first urge to void
  • Increased regional cerebral blood flow in lateral frontal cortex and decreased bladder volume at first desire/urge to void when DBS was turned OFF
  • Having a full bladder was associated with increased regional cerebral blood flow in the anterior cingulate cortex, which was more pronounced in when DBS was turned OFF
    Winge et al. [39] 2007 21 patients with idiopathic PD
  • No significant changes in urodynamic parameters after DBS after 6-month follow-up
  GPi Mordasini et al. [14] 2014 6 males and 5 females with severe therapy-refractory dystonia
  • No detrusor activity seen with DBS ON
  • DBS associated with decreased maximum urinary flow rate and increased postvoid residual
Basal ganglia Central intermediate nucleus Kessler et al. [12] 2008 5 males and 2 females with essential tremor
  • DBS associated with reduced bladder volume at first desire to void, strong desire to void, and MCC
Brainstem Periaqueductal grey (PAG) Green et al. [10] 2012 Urethrane-anesthetized rats; 6 patients with chronic neuropathic pain
  • In rats, DBS reversibly inhibited bladder contractions, and external urethral sphincter remained tonically contracted, preserving continence
  • In humans, patients tended to have a higher MCC after DBS, but no change in subjective pain scores
  PAG Stone et al. [5] 2015 39 urethrane-anesthetized rats
  • PAG-DBS and tegmentum lateral/ventral to the PAG reversibly inhibited voiding
  • Increased MCC without any changes in bladder compliance or respiratory function
  PPN, PAG, LC, and PnO Chen et al. [1] 2017 54 urethrane-anesthetized rats
  • PPN-DBS inhibited bladder contractions, the strength of which increased with increasing voltage
  • PnO and PAG-DBS inhibited bladder contractions, but less profoundly than PPN-DBS
  • LC-DBS augmented bladder contractions
  PMC Jensen et al. [49] 2009 4 Göttingen minipigs
  • DBS of the structure homologous to the PMC increased detrusor pressure, which led to visible voiding in some subjects
  • DBS did not affect consciousness or general thriving even after several weeks of implantation and stimulator use
  PPN Roy et al. [7] 2017 5 males with PD
  • Increase in MCC after DBS
MCC significantly increased in the ON compared to the OFF state (0.69 ± 0.06 ml vs. 0.41 ± 0.04 ml, respectively < 0.05) without changing bladder compliance [5]. Chen et al. used rats to evaluate bipolar DBS of the PPN, PAG, LC, and PnO. PPN-DBS potently inhibited reflexive bladder contractions; the amount of bladder contraction area inhibited increased with rising voltage. DBS of the PAG and PnO also inhibited reflexive bladder contractions, but less effectively than PPN-DBS. Conversely, DBS of the LC (LC-DBS) between 1.75 and 2 V enhanced reflexive bladder contractions [1]. Moreover, unilateral DBS of the supra-pontine region homologous to the PMC in minipigs demonstrated increased detrusor pressure and promoted voiding. The authors suggest that inhibition of this region may have a therapeutic role in controlling unwanted micturition [49].
Currently, the use of brainstem-targeted DBS for improving voiding dysfunction in humans is limited to two studies. Green et al. performed urodynamics in 6 patients who initially underwent PAG-DBS for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain. When turned ON, PAG-DBS significantly increased MCC, possibly by diminishing discomfort associated with having a full bladder. PAG-DBS did not change first sensation of filling, or first/strong desire to void [10]. Similar findings were reported by Roy et al. who looked at 5 PD patients with deep brain stimulators previously placed in the PPN. MCC increased slightly with stimulation in the ON versus the OFF state (199 ml vs. 131 ml, < 0.05), but the response magnitude varied between subjects [7]. Taken together, these studies show promise for brainstem structures as plausible DBS targets to alter and improve voiding function in patients with PD and other neurologic diseases. Future research will not only aid in developing therapeutics but may also elicit the precise mechanisms of individual brainstem structures in micturition.


While DBS appears to be a promising therapy for modulating LUTS in PD patients, the current research is mostly limited to small cohorts. Larger clinical trials are needed to truly delineate how DBS affects voiding function with respect to urodynamic and subjective parameters.
NCT03202251 is a prospective cohort study enrolling patients with an American Urological Association symptom score (AUA-SS) > 8 and neurologic symptoms who are deemed candidates for DBS. Study participants will undergo subjective and objective assessment of their LUTS using validated questionnaires and urodynamics, respectively. Primary outcomes include change in AUA-SS and Incontinence Quality of Life score from pre-DBS to > 60 d after DBS [50]. Although this trial does not specify the placement of stimulators in a particular location, investigating the effects of DBS to different brain structures on voiding dysfunction would also be beneficial.
Furthermore, no studies exist comparing DBS with other common surgical interventions used in advanced PD patients with LUTS and voiding dysfunction, such as intravesical onabotulinum toxin A, sacral neuromodulation, or peripheral tibial nerve stimulation. While DBS is a more invasive procedure, it may be beneficial in patients who have PD-related motor and urinary symptoms. Such a study would be useful in counseling patients on therapy options and would enhance the interdisciplinary collaboration that is essential in the care of these patients.
The use of DBS may help alleviate urinary symptoms and improve voiding function in other neurological diseases. One study in rats with traumatic brain injury reported significant improvements in voiding efficiency after DBS of the PnO, the effect of which increased as stimulation voltage increased [51]. DBS-SCI (NCT03053791) is a phase I/II multi-center open-label trial assessing the effects of DBS targeting the mesencephalic locomotor region in spinal cord injury patients. The trial is mostly aimed at evaluating effects on motor function but important secondary outcomes include changes in sexual and urinary function, measured by validated questionnaires, bladder diary, urodynamics, and renal bladder ultrasound [52].


Many PD patients experience bothersome LUTS and voiding dysfunction, adversely affecting quality of life. For those who undergo DBS for motor symptoms, some may experience subjective and objective changes in their urinary habits, which may be principally dependent on the target of the stimulator. The physiology underlying DBS’s effects on voiding dysfunction and LUTS is not well elucidated; further work is needed to determine if these improvements are attributable to better control of motor symptoms or another mechanism. Larger, long-term randomized studies are warranted to fully delineate the benefits and other outcomes of DBS for LUTS and voiding dysfunction in patients with PD and other neurologic diseases.
  1. Chen SC, Chu PY, Hsieh TH, Li YT, Peng CW. Feasibility of deep brain stimulation for controlling the lower urinary tract functions: an animal study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Dec;128(12):2438–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2017.09.102 PMID: 29096218
  2. Finazzi-Agrò E, Peppe A, D’Amico A, Petta F, Mazzone P, Stanzione P, et al. Effects of subthalamic nucleus stimulation on urodynamic findings in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Urol. 2003 Apr;169(4):1388–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000055520.88377.dc PMID: 12629368
  3. Sakakibara R, Nakazawa K, Uchiyama T, Yoshiyama M, Yamanishi T, Hattori T. Effects of subthalamic nucleus stimulation on the micturation reflex in cats. Neuroscience. 2003;120(3):871–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(03)00319-1 PMID: 12895527
  4. Picillo M, Palladino R, Barone P, Erro R, Colosimo C, Marconi R, et al.; PRIAMO Study Group. The PRIAMO study: urinary dysfunction as a marker of disease progression in early Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurol. 2017 Jun;24(6):788–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13290 PMID: 28425642
  5. Stone E, Coote JH, Lovick TA. Effect of electrical vs. chemical deep brain stimulation at midbrain sites on micturition in anaesthetized rats. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2015 May;214(1):135–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.12491 PMID: 25778550
  6. Winge K, Nielsen KK. Bladder dysfunction in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Nov;31(8):1279–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22237 PMID: 22488851
  7. Roy HA, Pond D, Roy C, Forrow B, Foltynie T, Zrinzo L, et al. Effects of pedunculopontine nucleus stimulation on human bladder function. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Feb;37(2):726–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23321 PMID: 28605052
  8. Dafsari HS, Martinez-Martin P, Rizos A, Trost M, Dos Santos Ghilardi MG, Reddy P, et al.; EUROPAR and the International Parkinson and Movement Disorders Society Non-Motor Parkinson’s Disease Study Group. EuroInf 2: subthalamic stimulation, apomorphine, and levodopa infusion in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2019 Mar;34(3):353–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.27626 PMID: 30719763
  9. Dafsari HS, Reddy P, Herchenbach C, Wawro S, Petry-Schmelzer JN, Visser-Vandewalle V, et al.; IPMDS Non-Motor Symptoms Study Group. Beneficial Effects of Bilateral Subthalamic Stimulation on Non-Motor Symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease. Brain Stimul. 2016 Jan-Feb;9(1):78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2015.08.005 PMID: 26385442
  10. Green AL, Stone E, Sitsapesan H, Turney BW, Coote JH, Aziz TZ, et al. Switching off micturition using deep brain stimulation at midbrain sites. Ann Neurol. 2012 Jul;72(1):144–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.23571 PMID: 22829274
  11. sHerzog J, Weiss PH, Assmus A, Wefer B, Seif C, Braun PM, et al. Subthalamic stimulation modulates cortical control of urinary bladder in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2006 Dec;129(Pt 12):3366–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl302 PMID: 17077105
  12. Kessler TM, Burkhard FC, Z’Brun S, Stibal A, Studer UE, Hess CW, et al. Effect of thalamic deep brain stimulation on lower urinary tract function. Eur Urol. 2008 Mar;53(3):607–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.07.015 PMID: 17686571
  13. Mock S, Osborn DJ, Brown ET, Stuart Reynolds W, Turchan M, Pallavaram S, et al. The Impact of Pallidal and Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation on Urologic Function in Parkinson's Disease. Neuromodulation. 2016;19(7):717-23. Epub 2016/05/14. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12446 PubMed PMID: 27172446
  14. sMordasini L, Kessler TM, Kiss B, Schüpbach M, Pollo C, Kaelin-Lang A. Bladder function in patients with dystonia undergoing deep brain stimulation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014 Sep;20(9):1015–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.05.016 PMID: 24984838
  15. Seif C, Herzog J, van der Horst C, Schrader B, Volkmann J, Deuschl G, et al. Effect of subthalamic deep brain stimulation on the function of the urinary bladder. Ann Neurol. 2004 Jan;55(1):118–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.10806 PMID: 14705120
  16. Stefani A, Lozano AM, Peppe A, Stanzione P, Galati S, Tropepi D, et al. Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the pedunculopontine and subthalamic nuclei in severe Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2007 Jun;130(Pt 6):1596–607. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl346 PMID: 17251240
  17. Weaver FM, Follett K, Stern M, Hur K, Harris C, Marks WJ, Jr., et al. Bilateral deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy for patients with advanced Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009;301(1):63-73. Epub 2009/01/08. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2008.929 PubMed PMID: 19126811
  18. Williams A, Gill S, Varma T, Jenkinson C, Quinn N, Mitchell R, et al. Deep brain stimulation plus best medical therapy versus best medical therapy alone for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD SURG trial): a randomised, open-label trial. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(6):581-91. Epub 2010/05/04. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70093-4 PubMed PMID: 20434403
  19. Witte LP, Odekerken VJ, Boel JA, Schuurman PR, Gerbrandy-Schreuders LC, de Bie RM; NSTAPS study group. Does deep brain stimulation improve lower urinary tract symptoms in Parkinson’s disease? Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Jan;37(1):354–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23301 PMID: 28464331
  20. Yamamoto T, Uchiyama T, Asahina M, Yamanaka Y, Hirano S, Higuchi Y, et al. Urinary symptoms are correlated with quality of life after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Brain Behav. 2018;8(12):e01164. Epub 2018/11/20. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1164 PubMed PMID: 30451394
  21. Zong H, Meng F, Zhang Y, Wei G, Zhao H. Clinical study of the effects of deep brain stimulation on urinary dysfunctions in patients with Parkinson's disease. Clin Interv Aging. 2019;14:1159-66. Epub 2019/08/17. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S204368 PubMed PMID: 31417246
  22. Sakakibara R, Panicker J, Finazzi-Agro E, Iacovelli V, Bruschini H; Parkinson’s Disease Subcomittee, The Neurourology Promotion Committee in The International Continence Society. A guideline for the management of bladder dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease and other gait disorders. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Jun;35(5):551–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22764 PMID: 25810035
  23. Tai C, Wang J, Jin T, Wang P, Kim SG, Roppolo JR, et al. Brain switch for reflex micturition control detected by FMRI in rats. J Neurophysiol. 2009;102(5):2719-30. Epub 2009/09/11. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00700.2009 PubMed PMID: 19741099
  24. Magerkurth C, Schnitzer R, Braune S. Symptoms of autonomic failure in Parkinson’s disease: prevalence and impact on daily life. Clin Auton Res. 2005 Apr;15(2):76–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-005-0253-z PMID: 15834763
  25. Stöhrer M, Blok B, Castro-Diaz D, Chartier-Kastler E, Del Popolo G, Kramer G, et al. EAU guidelines on neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Eur Urol. 2009 Jul;56(1):81–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.04.028 PMID: 19403235
  26. Vurture G, Peyronnet B, Palma JA, Sussman RD, Malacarne DR, Feigin A, et al. Urodynamic Mechanisms Underlying Overactive Bladder Symptoms in Patients With Parkinson Disease. Int Neurourol J. 2019;23(3):211-8. Epub 2019/10/15. https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.1938086.043 PubMed PMID: 31607100
  27. Sakakibara R, Hattori T, Uchiyama T, Yamanishi T. Videourodynamic and sphincter motor unit potential analyses in Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;71(5):600-6. Epub 2001/10/19. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.71.5.600 PubMed PMID: 11606669
  28. Obeso JA, Olanow CW, Rodriguez-Oroz MC, Krack P, Kumar R, Lang AE; Deep-Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease Study Group. Deep-brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus or the pars interna of the globus pallidus in Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2001 Sep;345(13):956–63. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa000827 PMID: 11575287
  29. Herrington TM, Cheng JJ, Eskandar EN. Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 2016;115(1):19-38. Epub 2015/10/30. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00281.2015 PubMed PMID: 26510756
  30. Johnson MD, Miocinovic S, McIntyre CC, Vitek JL. Mechanisms and targets of deep brain stimulation in movement disorders. Neurotherapeutics. 2008;5(2):294-308. Epub 2008/04/09. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurt.2008.01.010 PubMed PMID: 18394571
  31. Astrom M, Diczfalusy E, Martens H, Wardell K. Relationship between neural activation and electric field distribution during deep brain stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015 Feb;62(2):664–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2014.2363494 PMID: 25350910
  32. Okun MS, Gallo BV, Mandybur G, Jagid J, Foote KD, Revilla FJ, et al.; SJM DBS Study Group. Subthalamic deep brain stimulation with a constant-current device in Parkinson’s disease: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2012 Feb;11(2):140–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70308-8 PMID: 22239915
  33. Bratsos S, Karponis D, Saleh SN. Efficacy and Safety of Deep Brain Stimulation in the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Cureus. 2018;10(10):e3474. Epub 2019/01/17. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3474 PubMed PMID: 30648026
  34. Charles D, Konrad PE, Neimat JS, Molinari AL, Tramontana MG, Finder SG, et al. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in early stage Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014;20(7):731-7. Epub 2014/04/29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.03.019 PubMed PMID: 24768120
  35. Deuschl G, Schade-Brittinger C, Krack P, Volkmann J, Schäfer H, Bötzel K, et al.; German Parkinson Study Group, Neurostimulation Section. A randomized trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug;355(9):896–908. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa060281 PMID: 16943402
  36. Approval P. PMA. Silver Spring (MD): U.S. Food & Drug Administration; 2020.[ [cited 2002]], Available from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpma/pma.cfm?id=P960009S007
  37. Schuepbach WM, Rau J, Knudsen K, Volkmann J, Krack P, Timmermann L, et al.; EARLYSTIM Study Group. Neurostimulation for Parkinson’s disease with early motor complications. N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb;368(7):610–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1205158 PMID: 23406026
  38. Vishwajit S, Herco M, Siddiqui MS, Cartwright M, Patel BN, Badlani GH. The effect of deep brain stimulation on voiding dysfunction in parkinson’s disease and essential tremor. J Urol. 2009;181(4):673–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(09)61888-7.
  39. Winge K, Nielsen KK, Stimpel H, Lokkegaard A, Jensen SR, Werdelin L. Lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder control in advanced Parkinson’s disease: effects of deep brain stimulation in the subthalamic nucleus. Mov Disord. 2007 Jan;22(2):220–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.21253 PMID: 17133504
  40. Buhmann C, Huckhagel T, Engel K, Gulberti A, Hidding U, Poetter-Nerger M, et al. Adverse events in deep brain stimulation: A retrospective long-term analysis of neurological, psychiatric and other occurrences. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0178984. Epub 2017/07/06. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178984 PubMed PMID: 28678830
  41. Constantinescu R, Eriksson B, Jansson Y, Johnels B, Holmberg B, Gudmundsdottir T, et al. Key clinical milestones 15 years and onwards after DBS-STN surgery-A retrospective analysis of patients that underwent surgery between 1993 and 2001. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;154:43–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.01.010 PMID: 28113102
  42. Krack P, Batir A, Van Blercom N, Chabardes S, Fraix V, Ardouin C, et al. Five-year follow-up of bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2003 Nov;349(20):1925–34. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa035275 PMID: 14614167
  43. Dalmose AL, Bjarkam CR, Sørensen JC, Djurhuus JC, Jørgensen TM. Effects of high frequency deep brain stimulation on urine storage and voiding function in conscious minipigs. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(3):265–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20026 PMID: 15098225
  44. Herzog J, Weiss PH, Assmus A, Wefer B, Seif C, Braun PM, et al. Improved sensory gating of urinary bladder afferents in Parkinson’s disease following subthalamic stimulation. Brain. 2008 Jan;131(Pt 1):132–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm254 PMID: 17977862
  45. Arya NG, Weissbart SJ, Xu S, Rao H. Brain activation in response to bladder filling in healthy adults: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Apr;36(4):960–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23058 PMID: 27367364
  46. Harvie C, Weissbart SJ, Kadam-Halani P, Rao H, Arya LA. Brain activation during the voiding phase of micturition in healthy adults: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Clin Anat. 2019;32(1):13-9. Epub 2018/08/03. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23244 PubMed PMID: 30069958
  47. Hariz MI, Krack P, Alesch F, Augustinsson LE, Bosch A, Ekberg R, et al. Multicentre European study of thalamic stimulation for parkinsonian tremor: a 6 year follow-up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Jun;79(6):694–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2007.118653 PMID: 17898034
  48. Solopchuk O, Sebti M, Bouvy C, Benoit CE, Warlop T, Jeanjean A, et al. Locus Coeruleus atrophy doesn't relate to fatigue in Parkinson's disease. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):12381. Epub 2018/08/19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30128-y PubMed PMID: 30120287
  49. Jensen KN, Deding D, Sørensen JC, Bjarkam CR. Long-term implantation of deep brain stimulation electrodes in the pontine micturition centre of the Göttingen minipig. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009 Jul;151(7):785–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0334-1 PMID: 19404572
  50. Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with LUTS. NIH US National Library of Medicine; 2018 [cited 2020]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03202251?term=deep+brain+stimulation+urinary&draw=2&rank=2
  51. Praveen Rajneesh C, Lai CH, Chen SC, Hsieh TH, Chin HY, Peng CW. Improved voiding function by deep brain stimulation in traumatic brain-injured animals with bladder dysfunctions. Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Jan;51(1):41–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-018-2028-1 PMID: 30474784
  52. sDeep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury for Improvement of Gait (DBS-SCI). NIH US National Library of Medicine; 2020 [cited 2020]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03053791?term=deep+brain+stimulation+urinary&draw=2&rank=5
Back to top
Bladder, Electronic ISSN: 2327-2120 Print ISSN: TBA, Published by POL Scientific