POL Scientific / Bladder / Volume 2 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.14440/bladder.2015.39
Cite this article
22
Citations
58
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Disparities in overall and urothelial carcinoma specific mortality associated with healthcare insurance status

Mohummad Minhaj Siddiqui§* Niall M. Heney W. Scott McDougal Adam S. Feldman
Show Less
1 Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Bladder 2015 , 2(1), 1–6;
Published: 26 February 2015
© 2015 by the Author(s). Licensee POL Scientific, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Objective: We investigated the association of insurance status with urothelial carcinoma (UC) mortality outcomes to further understand the relationship of socioeconomic status (SES) and UC disease outcomes.
Materials and Methods: We performed an IRB approved, retrospective review of patients newly diagnosed with bladder UC in the years 2004 and 2005. Data were collected from January 2004 to September 2014 regarding insurance, demographics, operations, surgical pathology, and follow-up care. Insurance was characterized as lower SES and high SES based on election to utilize private vs. public sources as well as purchase of supplemental Medicare coverage.
Results: A total of 213 patients were examined with a mean follow-up of 84 months. The high SES and lower SES insurance groups presented with similar disease stage (26% ≥ T2 in high SES insurance vs. 33%, P = 0.1) and grade (60% high-grade in high SES vs. 59%, P = 0.9). Significant differences were seen in one-year UC specific mortality (5% high SES insurance vs. 21%, P = 0.003) and five-year UC specific mortality (19% high SES insurance vs. 42%, P = 0.007). Upon multivariate analysis controlling for age, gender, Charlson comorbidity score, grade, stage, and metastatic disease on presentation, insurance type remained a significant risk factor for increased mortality from UC (HR = 2.6, P < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a persistence of lower survival with time.
Conclusions: We found disparities in mortality from bladder cancer associated with source of insurance. This association persisted upon multivariate analysis as an independent risk factor for death from bladder UC.

Keywords
bladder cancer
urothelial carcinoma
insurance
socioeconomic status
References

[1] Trinh Q-D, Schmitges J, Sun M, Sammon J, Shariat SF, Zorn K, et al. Morbidity and mortality of radical prostatectomy differs by insurance status. Cancer 2012;118:1803–10.

[2] SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975-2008. National Cancer Institute; n.d.

[3] Du XL, Lin CC, Johnson NJ, Altekruse S. Effects of individual‐level socioeconomic factors on racial disparities in cancer treatment and survival. Cancer 2011;117:3242–51.

[4] Coleman MP, Rachet B, Woods LM, Mitry E, Riga M, Cooper N, et al. Trends and socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in England and Wales up to 2001. Br J Cancer 2004;90:1367–73.

[5] Begum G, Dunn JA, Bryan RT, Bathers S, Wallace DMA, West Midlands Urological Research Group. Socio-economic deprivation and survival in bladder cancer. BJU Int 2004;94:539–43.

[6] Moran A, Sowerbutts A-M, Collins S, Clarke N, Cowan R. Bladder cancer: worse survival in women from deprived areas. Br J Cancer 2004;90:2142–4.

[7] Eriksen KT, Petersen A, Poulsen AH, Deltour I, Raaschou-Nielsen O. Social inequality and incidence of and survival from cancers of the kidney and urinary bladder in a population-based study in Denmark, 1994-2003. Eur J Cancer 2008;44:2030–42.

[8] Lipworth L, Abelin T, Connelly RR. Socio-economic factors in the prognosis of cancer patients. J Chronic Dis 1970;23:105–15.

[9] Boyd C, Zhang-Salomons JY, Groome PA, Mackillop WJ. Associations between community income and cancer survival in Ontario, Canada, and the United States. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:2244–55.

[10] Brookfield KF, Cheung MC, Gomez C, Yang R, Nieder AM, Lee DJ, et al. Survival disparities among African American women with invasive bladder cancer in Florida. Cancer 2009;115:4196–209.

[11] Koroukian SM, Bakaki PM, Raghavan D. Survival disparities by Medicaid status: An analysis of 8 cancers. Cancer 2011:n–a.

[12] Yorio JT, Yan J, Xie Y, Gerber DE. Socioeconomic Disparities in Lung Cancer Treatment and Outcomes Persist Within a Single Academic Medical Center. Clin Lung Cancer 2012.

[13] Du XLX, Lin CCC, Johnson NJN, Altekruse SS. Effects of individual-level socioeconomic factors on racial disparities in cancer treatment and survival: findings from the National Longitudinal Mortality Study, 1979-2003. LID - 10.1002/cncr.25854 [doi]. Rna 2011;117:3242–51.

[14] Taub DA, Hollenbeck BK, Cooper KL, Dunn RL, Miller DC, Taylor JMG, et al. Racial disparities in resource utilization for cystectomy. Urology 2006;67:288–93.

[15] Roux AVAD, Merkin SSS, Arnett DD, Chambless LL, Massing MM, Nieto FJF, et al. Neighborhood of residence and incidence of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 2001;345:99–106.

[16] Hollenbeck BK, Dunn RL, Ye Z, Hollingsworth JM, Lee CT, Birkmeyer JD. Racial differences in treatment and outcomes among patients with early stage bladder cancer. Cancer 2010;116:50–6.

[17] Shackley DC, Clarke NW. Impact of socioeconomic status on bladder cancer outcome. Curr Opin Urol 2005;15:328–31.

Share
Back to top
Bladder, Electronic ISSN: 2327-2120 Print ISSN: TBA, Published by POL Scientific